Back to Search
Start Over
Origins of food reinforcement in infants.
- Source :
-
The American journal of clinical nutrition [Am J Clin Nutr] 2015 Mar; Vol. 101 (3), pp. 515-22. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Jan 14. - Publication Year :
- 2015
-
Abstract
- Background: Rapid weight gain in infancy is associated with a higher risk of obesity in children and adults. A high relative reinforcing value of food is cross-sectionally related to obesity; lean children find nonfood alternatives more reinforcing than do overweight/obese children. However, to our knowledge, there is no research on how and when food reinforcement develops.<br />Objective: This study was designed to assess whether the reinforcing value of food and nonfood alternatives could be tested in 9- to 18-mo-old infants and whether the reinforcing value of food and nonfood alternatives is differentially related to infant weight status.<br />Design: Reinforcing values were assessed by using absolute progressive ratio schedules of reinforcement, with presentation of food and nonfood alternatives counterbalanced in 2 separate studies. Two nonfood reinforcers [Baby Einstein-Baby MacDonald shows (study 1, n = 27) or bubbles (study 2, n = 30)] were tested against the baby's favorite food. Food reinforcing ratio (FRR) was quantified by measuring the reinforcing value of food (Food Pmax) in proportion to the total reinforcing value of food and a nonfood alternative (DVD Pmax or BUB Pmax).<br />Results: Greater weight-for-length z score was associated with a greater FRR of a favorite food in study 1 (FRR-DVD) (r = 0.60, P < 0.001) and FRR of a favorite food in study 2 (FRR-BUB) (r = 0.49, P = 0.006), primarily because of the strong association between greater weight-for-length z score and lower DVD Pmax (r = -0.71, P < 0.0001) and BUB Pmax (r = -0.53, P = 0.003). Infant monthly weight gain was positively associated with FRR-DVD (r = 0.57, P = 0.009) and FRR-BUB (r = 0.37, P = 0.047).<br />Conclusions: Our newly developed paradigm, which tested 2 different nonfood alternatives, demonstrated that lean infants find nonfood alternatives more reinforcing than do overweight/obese infants. This observation suggests that strengthening the alternative reinforcers may have a protective effect against childhood obesity.<br /> (© 2015 American Society for Nutrition.)
- Subjects :
- Female
Food Preferences psychology
Humans
Hyperphagia epidemiology
Hyperphagia prevention & control
Infant
Infant Food
Male
New York epidemiology
Pilot Projects
Play and Playthings psychology
Risk Factors
Video Recording
Weight Gain
Child Development
Eating psychology
Feeding Behavior
Hyperphagia psychology
Infant Behavior
Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
Reinforcement, Psychology
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1938-3207
- Volume :
- 101
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- The American journal of clinical nutrition
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 25733636
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.114.093237