Back to Search Start Over

[Options for the reduction of magnetic susceptibility artifacts caused by implanted microchips in 0.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging].

Authors :
Piesnack S
Oechtering G
Ludewig E
Source :
Tierarztliche Praxis. Ausgabe K, Kleintiere/Heimtiere [Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere] 2015; Vol. 43 (2), pp. 83-92. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Mar 02.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Objective: Microchips contain ferromagnetic materials, which lead to severe focal image interferences when performing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Very small animals are particularly prone to these susceptibility artifacts, which may hinder analysis of the neck-region MRI image. We investigated the impact of sequence type on the artifact's size and determined the optimal imaging parameters to minimize these artifacts. Furthermore, the minimum distance between the microchip and the spinal canal required to assess the spinal structures should be determined.<br />Material and Methods: Investigations were performed on the cadavers of 26 cats and two dogs using a low-field MRI System (field strength 0.5 Tesla). To quantify susceptibility artifacts, several sequence types (spin echo, turbo-spin echo (TSE), gradient echo) and imaging parameters (echo time (TE), voxel volume, frequency direction) were systematically varied. Additionally, computed tomography imaging was performed to determine the distance between the microchip and the spinal canal.<br />Results: The size of the artifact was smallest with T1-weighted TSE sequences. A short TE (10 ms) and a small voxel size (acquisition matrix 256 x 256 pixels, field of view 160 mm, slice thickness 2 mm) significantly reduced artifact size. Furthermore, it could be shown that by changing the frequency- and phase-encoding direction, the shape and orientation of the maximum dimension of the artifact could be influenced. Even when using an optimized T1-weighted TSE sequence, it was impossible to evaluate the spinal cord when the distance between the microchip and the center of the spinal canal was < 19  mm.<br />Conclusion and Clinical Relevance: In MR studies of the cervical spine of small dogs and cats, microchips can cause severe susceptibility artifacts. Because of the small distance between the microchip and the spinal structures, spinal evaluation may be limited or impossible. The investigations demonstrated that the adjustment of sequence parameters helps to significantly minimize artifact size and shape. The greatest reduction in artifact size was achieved by using a T1-weighted TSE sequence.

Details

Language :
German
ISSN :
2567-5842
Volume :
43
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Tierarztliche Praxis. Ausgabe K, Kleintiere/Heimtiere
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
25727725
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.15654/TPK-140663