Back to Search Start Over

Quantitative bloodstain analysis: differentiation of contact transfer patterns versus spatter patterns on fabric via microscopic inspection.

Authors :
Cho Y
Springer F
Tulleners FA
Ristenpart WD
Source :
Forensic science international [Forensic Sci Int] 2015 Apr; Vol. 249, pp. 233-40. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Feb 04.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

In crime scene reconstruction, it is often necessary to differentiate "contact transfer" and "spatter" bloodstain patterns found on clothing. Current methodologies, however, are qualitative and prone to context bias. In this work, we demonstrate that microscopic inspection of the stain orientations provides a quantitative differentiation of bloodstains resulting from spatter versus contact transfer. Specifically, common knitted fabrics are comprised of parallel rows of left loop legs, in an upward diagonal orientation (/), and right loop legs in a downward diagonal orientation (\). Our microscopic examination of more than 65,000 individual stained loop legs shows that spatter stains are approximately evenly distributed between left and right loop legs, but contact transfer stains are unevenly distributed: depending on the type of surface contacted, as many as 82% of the stains were preferentially located on the left loop legs. We further show that in these fabrics the left loop legs protrude further out than the right loop legs by approximately 50 μm, indicating that the observation of left loop legs preferentially stained over right loop legs is associated with the topography of the fabric. These findings suggest that microscopic quantification of the relative loop leg stain distributions could provide an objective means of differentiating contact transfer versus spatter patterns in crime scene reconstruction.<br /> (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1872-6283
Volume :
249
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Forensic science international
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
25723999
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.01.021