Back to Search Start Over

Detection of significant coronary artery disease by noninvasive anatomical and functional imaging.

Authors :
Neglia D
Rovai D
Caselli C
Pietila M
Teresinska A
Aguadé-Bruix S
Pizzi MN
Todiere G
Gimelli A
Schroeder S
Drosch T
Poddighe R
Casolo G
Anagnostopoulos C
Pugliese F
Rouzet F
Le Guludec D
Cappelli F
Valente S
Gensini GF
Zawaideh C
Capitanio S
Sambuceti G
Marsico F
Perrone Filardi P
Fernández-Golfín C
Rincón LM
Graner FP
de Graaf MA
Fiechter M
Stehli J
Gaemperli O
Reyes E
Nkomo S
Mäki M
Lorenzoni V
Turchetti G
Carpeggiani C
Marinelli M
Puzzuoli S
Mangione M
Marcheschi P
Mariani F
Giannessi D
Nekolla S
Lombardi M
Sicari R
Scholte AJ
Zamorano JL
Kaufmann PA
Underwood SR
Knuuti J
Source :
Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging [Circ Cardiovasc Imaging] 2015 Mar; Vol. 8 (3).
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Background: The choice of imaging techniques in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) varies between countries, regions, and hospitals. This prospective, multicenter, comparative effectiveness study was designed to assess the relative accuracy of commonly used imaging techniques for identifying patients with significant CAD.<br />Methods and Results: A total of 475 patients with stable chest pain and intermediate likelihood of CAD underwent coronary computed tomographic angiography and stress myocardial perfusion imaging by single photon emission computed tomography or positron emission tomography, and ventricular wall motion imaging by stress echocardiography or cardiac magnetic resonance. If ≥1 test was abnormal, patients underwent invasive coronary angiography. Significant CAD was defined by invasive coronary angiography as >50% stenosis of the left main stem, >70% stenosis in a major coronary vessel, or 30% to 70% stenosis with fractional flow reserve ≤0.8. Significant CAD was present in 29% of patients. In a patient-based analysis, coronary computed tomographic angiography had the highest diagnostic accuracy, the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve being 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.88-0.94), sensitivity being 91%, and specificity being 92%. Myocardial perfusion imaging had good diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve, 0.74; confidence interval, 0.69-0.78), sensitivity 74%, and specificity 73%. Wall motion imaging had similar accuracy (area under the curve, 0.70; confidence interval, 0.65-0.75) but lower sensitivity (49%, P<0.001) and higher specificity (92%, P<0.001). The diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging and wall motion imaging were lower than that of coronary computed tomographic angiography (P<0.001).<br />Conclusions: In a multicenter European population of patients with stable chest pain and low prevalence of CAD, coronary computed tomographic angiography is more accurate than noninvasive functional testing for detecting significant CAD defined invasively.<br />Clinical Trial Registration Url: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00979199.<br /> (© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1942-0080
Volume :
8
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
25711274
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002179