Back to Search
Start Over
Detection of significant coronary artery disease by noninvasive anatomical and functional imaging.
- Source :
-
Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging [Circ Cardiovasc Imaging] 2015 Mar; Vol. 8 (3). - Publication Year :
- 2015
-
Abstract
- Background: The choice of imaging techniques in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) varies between countries, regions, and hospitals. This prospective, multicenter, comparative effectiveness study was designed to assess the relative accuracy of commonly used imaging techniques for identifying patients with significant CAD.<br />Methods and Results: A total of 475 patients with stable chest pain and intermediate likelihood of CAD underwent coronary computed tomographic angiography and stress myocardial perfusion imaging by single photon emission computed tomography or positron emission tomography, and ventricular wall motion imaging by stress echocardiography or cardiac magnetic resonance. If ≥1 test was abnormal, patients underwent invasive coronary angiography. Significant CAD was defined by invasive coronary angiography as >50% stenosis of the left main stem, >70% stenosis in a major coronary vessel, or 30% to 70% stenosis with fractional flow reserve ≤0.8. Significant CAD was present in 29% of patients. In a patient-based analysis, coronary computed tomographic angiography had the highest diagnostic accuracy, the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve being 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.88-0.94), sensitivity being 91%, and specificity being 92%. Myocardial perfusion imaging had good diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve, 0.74; confidence interval, 0.69-0.78), sensitivity 74%, and specificity 73%. Wall motion imaging had similar accuracy (area under the curve, 0.70; confidence interval, 0.65-0.75) but lower sensitivity (49%, P<0.001) and higher specificity (92%, P<0.001). The diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging and wall motion imaging were lower than that of coronary computed tomographic angiography (P<0.001).<br />Conclusions: In a multicenter European population of patients with stable chest pain and low prevalence of CAD, coronary computed tomographic angiography is more accurate than noninvasive functional testing for detecting significant CAD defined invasively.<br />Clinical Trial Registration Url: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00979199.<br /> (© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.)
- Subjects :
- Aged
Area Under Curve
Comparative Effectiveness Research
Coronary Artery Disease diagnostic imaging
Coronary Artery Disease epidemiology
Coronary Artery Disease physiopathology
Coronary Stenosis diagnostic imaging
Coronary Stenosis epidemiology
Coronary Stenosis physiopathology
Europe epidemiology
Female
Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Predictive Value of Tests
Prevalence
Prospective Studies
ROC Curve
Severity of Illness Index
Ventricular Function
Coronary Angiography methods
Coronary Artery Disease diagnosis
Coronary Stenosis diagnosis
Echocardiography, Stress
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Myocardial Perfusion Imaging methods
Positron-Emission Tomography
Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1942-0080
- Volume :
- 8
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 25711274
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002179