Back to Search Start Over

Obligations and frustrations with high-risk patients: ethics of physicians' evaluations.

Authors :
Jones JW
McCullough LB
Source :
Journal of vascular surgery [J Vasc Surg] 2015 Feb; Vol. 61 (2), pp. 533-4.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

A surgeon, Dr A. Droit, has been following a 97-year-old male with a type IV thoracoabdominal aneurysm, which became symptomatic this morning and is leaking. The patient is frail but active with no important comorbidities. The anatomy demands an open procedure. The patient is a former renowned physician who has been a longtime family friend of Dr Droit-like a grandfather. He presented incoherent with sagging blood pressure. A complicating factor is that Dr D. Rag, the chief anesthesiologist, decided that neither he nor any of his staff would provide anesthesia. Dr Droit knows an anesthesiologist who handles high-risk patients at another hospital in the medical center. The patient has worsened over the last hour, is becoming more unstable, and is unable to respond but his wife wishes to consent for surgery. What should Dr Droit do?<br /> (Copyright © 2015 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1097-6809
Volume :
61
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of vascular surgery
Publication Type :
Editorial & Opinion
Accession number :
25619578
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2014.12.001