Back to Search Start Over

Double-blind, randomized, prospective comparison of loading doses of 600 mg clopidogrel versus 60 mg prasugrel in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction scheduled for primary percutaneous intervention: the ETAMI trial (early thienopyridine treatment to improve primary PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction).

Authors :
Zeymer U
Mochmann HC
Mark B
Arntz HR
Thiele H
Diller F
Montalescot G
Zahn R
Source :
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions [JACC Cardiovasc Interv] 2015 Jan; Vol. 8 (1 Pt B), pp. 147-154. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Nov 04.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Objectives: This study compared the timing of onset of antiplatelet action after treatment with clopidogrel and prasugrel at first medical contact in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) scheduled for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI).<br />Background: Little is known about the timing of onset of antiplatelet action after a pre-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) loading dose of clopidogrel or prasugrel in patients with STEMI.<br />Methods: This double-blind, prospective study randomized 62 patients with STEMI scheduled for PPCI in the ambulance or the emergency department to 60 mg prasugrel (n = 31) or 600 mg clopidogrel (n = 31). The primary endpoint was the platelet reactivity index (PRI) measured with the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein assay 2 h after intake of the study medication. Secondary endpoints were PRI after 4 h, TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) patency of the infarct-related artery before and after PCI, and clinical events until day 30.<br />Results: The PRI after 2 h (50.4 ± 32.7% vs. 66.3 ± 22.2%; p = 0.035) and after 4 h (39.1 ± 27.5% vs. 54.5 ± 49.3%; p = 0.038) were significantly lower with prasugrel compared with clopidogrel. In addition, the rate of patients with a PRI <50% tended to be higher with prasugrel compared with clopidogrel after 2 h (46.7% vs. 28.6%; p = 0.15) and after 4 h (63.0% vs. 38.9%; p = 0.06). There were no significant differences in TIMI 2/3 patency before PCI (39.2% vs. 31.0%; p = 0.43) and TIMI 3 patency after PCI (88.5% vs. 89.3%; p = 0.92).<br />Conclusions: The pre-PCI administration of prasugrel in patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI was associated with a significant faster platelet inhibition compared with clopidogrel. Therefore, prasugrel should be preferred to clopidogrel in this setting. (ETAMI-Study: Early Thienopyridine Treatment to Improve Primary PCI in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction; NCT01327534).<br /> (Copyright © 2015 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1876-7605
Volume :
8
Issue :
1 Pt B
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
25616919
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2014.09.007