Back to Search Start Over

Distinct afferent innervation patterns within the human proximal and distal esophageal mucosa.

Authors :
Woodland P
Aktar R
Mthunzi E
Lee C
Peiris M
Preston SL
Blackshaw LA
Sifrim D
Source :
American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology [Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol] 2015 Mar 15; Vol. 308 (6), pp. G525-31. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Jan 08.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Little is known about the mucosal phenotype of the proximal human esophagus. There is evidence to suggest that the proximal esophagus is more sensitive to chemical and mechanical stimulation compared with the distal. This may have physiological relevance (e.g., in prevention of aspiration of gastroesophageal refluxate), but also pathological relevance (e.g., in reflux perception or dysphagia). Reasons for this increased sensitivity are unclear but may include impairment in mucosal barrier integrity or changes in sensory innervation. We assessed mucosal barrier integrity and afferent nerve distribution in the proximal and distal esophagus of healthy human volunteers. In 10 healthy volunteers baseline proximal and distal esophageal impedance was measured in vivo. Esophageal mucosal biopsies from the distal and proximal esophagus were taken, and baseline transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) was measured in Ussing chambers. Biopsies were examined immunohistochemically for presence and location of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-immunoreactive nerve fibers. In a further four healthy volunteers we investigated for colocalization of CGRP and protein gene product (PGP) 9.5 immunoreactivity in nerve fibers. Baseline impedance was higher in the proximal than in the distal esophagus [2,936 Ω (SD578) vs. 2,229 Ω (SD821); P = 0.03], however, baseline TER was not significantly different between them. Mucosal CGRP-immunoreactive nerves were found in the epithelium of both proximal and distal esophagus, but were located more superficially in the proximal mucosa compared with the distal [11.5 (SD7) vs. 21.7 (SD5) cell layers from lumen, P = 0.002] 19% of proximal, and 10% of distal mucosal PGP-immunoreactive fibers colocalized with CGRP. PGP-immunoreactive fibers were also significantly closer to the luminal surface in the proximal compared with the distal esophagus (P < 0.001). We conclude that mucosal barrier integrity is similar in proximal and distal esophagus, but proximal mucosal afferent nerves are in a more superficial location. The enhanced sensitivity to reflux-evoked symptoms of the proximal esophagus most likely has an anatomical basis.<br /> (Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1522-1547
Volume :
308
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
25573174
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00175.2014