Back to Search Start Over

Incompatibility between plant-derived defensive chemistry and immune response of two sphingid herbivores.

Authors :
Lampert EC
Bowers MD
Source :
Journal of chemical ecology [J Chem Ecol] 2015 Jan; Vol. 41 (1), pp. 85-92. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Dec 18.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Herbivorous insects use several different defenses against predators and parasites, and tradeoffs among defensive traits may occur if these traits are energetically demanding. Chemical defense and immune response potentially can interact, and both can be influenced by host plant chemistry. Two closely related caterpillars in the lepidopteran family Sphingidae are both attacked by the same specialist endoparasitoid species but have mostly non-overlapping host plant ranges that differ in secondary chemistry. Ceratomia catalpae is a specialist on Catalpa and also will feed on Chilopsis, which both produce iridoid glycosides. Ceratomia undulosa consumes members of the Oleaceae, which produce seco-iridoid glycosides. Immune response of the two species on a typical host plant species (Catalpa bignonioides for C. catalpa; Fraxinus americana for C. undulosa) was compared using a melanization assay, and did not differ. In a second experiment, the iridoid glycoside catalpol was added to the diets of both insects, and growth rate, mass, chemical defense, and immune response were evaluated. Increased dietary catalpol weakened the immune response of C. undulosa and altered the development rate of C. catalpae by prolonging the third instar and accelerating the fourth instar. Catalpol sequestration was negatively correlated with immune response of C. catalpae, while C. undulosa was unable to sequester catalpol. These results show that immune response can be negatively influenced by increasing concentrations of sequestered defensive compounds.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1573-1561
Volume :
41
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of chemical ecology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
25516226
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-014-0532-z