Back to Search Start Over

Clinical presentation and outcomes of coronary in-stent restenosis across 3-stent generations.

Authors :
Magalhaes MA
Minha S
Chen F
Torguson R
Omar AF
Loh JP
Escarcega RO
Lipinski MJ
Baker NC
Kitabata H
Ota H
Suddath WO
Satler LF
Pichard AD
Waksman R
Source :
Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions [Circ Cardiovasc Interv] 2014 Dec; Vol. 7 (6), pp. 768-76. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Dec 02.
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Background: Clinical presentation of bare metal stent in-stent restenosis (ISR) in patients undergoing target lesion revascularization is well characterized and negatively affects on outcomes, whereas the presentation and outcomes of first- and second-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) remains under-reported.<br />Methods and Results: The study included 909 patients (1077 ISR lesions) distributed as follows: bare metal stent (n=388), first-generation DES (n=425), and second-generation DES (n=96), categorized into acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or non-ACS presentation mode at the time of first target lesion revascularization. ACS was further classified as myocardial infarction (MI) and unstable angina. For bare metal stent, first-generation DES and second-generation DES, ACS was the clinical presentation in 67.8%, 71.0%, and 66.7% of patients, respectively (P=0.470), whereas MI occurred in 10.6%, 10.1%, and 5.2% of patients, respectively (P=0.273). The correlates for MI as ISR presentation were current smokers (odds ratio, 3.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.78-5.13; P<0.001), and chronic renal failure (odds ratio, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.60-4.70; P<0.001), with a protective trend for the second-generation DES ISR (odds ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.12-1.03; P=0.060). ACS presentations had an independent effect on major adverse cardiac events (death, MI, and re-target lesion revascularization) at 6 months (MI versus non-ACS: adjusted hazard ratio, 4.06; 95% CI, 1.84-8.94; P<0.001; unstable angina versus non-ACS: adjusted hazard ratio, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.01-3.87; P=0.046).<br />Conclusions: ISR clinical presentation is similar irrespective of stent type. MI as ISR presentation seems to be associated with patient and not device-related factors. ACS as ISR presentation has an independent effect on major adverse cardiac events, suggesting that ISR remains a hazard and should be minimized.<br /> (© 2014 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1941-7632
Volume :
7
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
25466551
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001341