Back to Search Start Over

Improved repeatability of nasal potential difference with a larger surface catheter.

Authors :
Vermeulen F
Proesmans M
Boon M
De Boeck K
Source :
Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society [J Cyst Fibros] 2015 May; Vol. 14 (3), pp. 317-23. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Oct 28.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Objective: To increase the power of nasal potential difference (NPD) as a biomarker of CFTR function, improvement of its repeatability is needed. We evaluated the improvement in repeatability resulting from measuring NPD (1) over a larger surface area and (2) at a fixed location.<br />Methods: To assess repeatability, NPD was measured on two occasions with a new method using a larger surface catheter at fixed locations on the nasal floor (LSC-floor(5cm) and LSC-floor(3cm)) or at the most negative basal potential (LSC-floor(max)); with a sidehole catheter on the nasal floor at 5 cm) from the nasal margin (SHC-floor(5cm)) or at the most negative potential (SHC-floor(max)); and with an endhole catheter below the inferior surface of the lower turbinate at the most negative potential (EHC-turb(max)).<br />Results: The within-subject standard deviation (S(w)) for repeated measurements of the total chloride response in the controls was smallest with the LSC-floor at a fixed location (LSC-floor(5cm) 3.1 mV; 95% CI 2.3-4.6 mV) and highest with the SHC-floor (SHC-floor(max) 14.6 mV; 95% CI 10.9-22.2 mV) or the EHC-turbinate (EHC-turb(max) 12.5 mV; 95% CI 10.7-23.0 mV) at the most negative basal potential. Measuring with the LSC-floor at the maximal potential increased the Sw (LSC-floor(max) 8.8 mV, 95% CI 6.0-16.1 mV, p=0.009 vs LSC-floor(5cm)), while measuring with the SHC-floor at a fixed location slightly decreased the Sw (SHC-floor(5cm) 9.8 mV, 95% CI 8.9-20.6 mV, p=0.06 vs SHC-floor(max)). In patients with cystic fibrosis, the S(w) was comparable, between 2.2 mV and 4.3 mV. Sample size calculations for trials using NPD to assess changes in ion transport showed that the number of subjects to be included could be approximately halved measuring with the larger surface catheter at a fixed location vs SHC or EHC at fixed locations.<br />Conclusion: Measuring the NPD at a fixed location and over a larger surface resulted in increased repeatability and thereby also power as a biomarker of CFTR modulation.<br /> (Copyright © 2014 European Cystic Fibrosis Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1873-5010
Volume :
14
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
25439742
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcf.2014.08.006