Back to Search
Start Over
The effect of epidural lidocaine administration on sedation of propofol general anesthesia: a randomized trial.
- Source :
-
Journal of clinical anesthesia [J Clin Anesth] 2014 Nov; Vol. 26 (7), pp. 523-9. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Oct 16. - Publication Year :
- 2014
-
Abstract
- Study Objective: To examine the influence of epidural and intravenous (IV) lidocaine, and height of the epidural sensory block, on the dose of propofol required for induction of general anesthesia.<br />Design: Randomized controlled study.<br />Setting: University hospital.<br />Patients: 66 adult, ASA physical status 1 and 2 patients, aged 25 to 65 years, undergoing elective abdominal surgery.<br />Interventions: Patients were randomized to 4 groups: the epidural saline control group (Group C; L2-L3 puncture, epidural and IV saline), the IV lidocaine group (Group IV; L2-L3 puncture, saline epidural, IV lidocaine 1 mg/kg), the lumbar epidural lidocaine group (Group EL; L2-L3 puncture, 1.5% lidocaine epidural, IV saline), and the thoracic epidural lidocaine group (Group ET; T9-T10 puncture, 1.5%lidocaine epidural, IV saline). Two minutes after the beginning of the infusion of IV lidocaine or saline, propofol anesthesia was initiated.<br />Measurements: Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and sensory block height were monitored. The induction dose of propofol, its estimated effect-site concentration (Ce), and plasma concentration were measured at various time points. Finally, we recorded the time taken for the bispectral index (BIS) to decrease to 60, the plasma concentration of lidocaine at induction, and the occurrence of adverse events. The induction time (when BIS reached 60) also was recorded.<br />Main Results: The induction propofol dose, Ce, and plasma concentration of propofol when BIS equaled 60 were significantly lower in Group IV, Group EL, and Group ET than Group C. The above parameters in Group ET (T9 - T10 puncture) were significantly less than in Group EL (L2 - L3 puncture). The induction doses of propofol and plasma concentration of propofol and lidocaine were significantly higher in Group IV than in Groups EL or ET.<br />Conclusions: Epidural and IV lidocaine reduce the dose of propofol required to induce general anesthesia. Administration of lidocaine via the epidural route reduces anesthetic requirements more so than the IV route. Propofol requirements were further reduced in patients with higher sensory epidural block.<br /> (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Abdomen surgery
Adult
Aged
Anesthesia, Epidural methods
Anesthesia, General methods
Anesthetics, Combined blood
Anesthetics, Intravenous blood
Anesthetics, Local blood
Conscious Sedation methods
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Electroencephalography drug effects
Female
Heart Rate drug effects
Humans
Infusions, Intravenous
Lidocaine blood
Male
Middle Aged
Propofol blood
Sensation drug effects
Anesthetics, Combined administration & dosage
Anesthetics, Intravenous administration & dosage
Anesthetics, Local administration & dosage
Lidocaine administration & dosage
Propofol administration & dosage
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1873-4529
- Volume :
- 26
- Issue :
- 7
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of clinical anesthesia
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 25439415
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2014.03.016