Accuracy of endometrial sampling compared to conventional dilatation and curettage in women with abnormal uterine bleeding.

MLA

Abdelazim, Ibrahim A., et al. “Accuracy of Endometrial Sampling Compared to Conventional Dilatation and Curettage in Women with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding.” Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 291, no. 5, May 2015, pp. 1121–26. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3523-y.

APA

Abdelazim, I. A., Abdelrazak, K. M., Elbiaa, A. A. M., Al-Kadi, M., & Yehia, A. H. (2015). Accuracy of endometrial sampling compared to conventional dilatation and curettage in women with abnormal uterine bleeding. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 291(5), 1121–1126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3523-y

Chicago

Abdelazim, Ibrahim A, Khaled M Abdelrazak, Assem A M Elbiaa, Mohamed Al-Kadi, and Amr H Yehia. 2015. “Accuracy of Endometrial Sampling Compared to Conventional Dilatation and Curettage in Women with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding.” Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 291 (5): 1121–26. doi:10.1007/s00404-014-3523-y.