Back to Search
Start Over
Aortic remodelling following the treatment and regression of hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.
- Source :
-
Clinical and experimental hypertension (New York, N.Y. : 1993) [Clin Exp Hypertens] 2015; Vol. 37 (4), pp. 308-16. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Oct 01. - Publication Year :
- 2015
-
Abstract
- Background: Increased arterial stiffness independently predicts adverse prognosis. While different antihypertensive strategies produce different magnitudes of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) regression, there are no comparative data on how these strategies affect arterial stiffness. The aim was to determine the longitudinal change in aortic stiffness following the treatment of essential hypertension with two mechanistically different antihypertensive treatment strategies.<br />Methods and Results: Forty-two patients with essential hypertension and CMR confirmed with LVH were randomly assigned to antihypertensive regimes for 6 months. Treatment strategies were designed either to inhibit the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) (valsartan and moxonidine, group VM) or to have neutral effect on these systems (bendroflumethiazide and amlodipine, group BA). Both treatment groups underwent identical baseline and a 6-month follow-up CMR and were compared with a healthy age-matched control group. Baseline aortic distensibility (AD) was lower in both hypertensive groups compared with controls (2.8 × 10(-3 )mmHg(-1) in group VM (p = 0.001) and 3.3 × 10(-3 )mmHg(-1) group BA (p = 0.039) compared with 4.5 × 10(-3 )mmHg(-1) in the control group). AD increased after antihypertensive therapy (VM: 2.8 × 10(-3 )mmHg(-1)-4.2 × 10(-3 )mmHg(-1) (p = 0.001); BA 3.3 × 10(-3 )mmHg(-1)-4.6 × 10(-3 )mmHg(-1) (p < 0.01)). In both treatment groups AD returned to a level comparable with the normal control group (p = 0.81) after 6 months.<br />Conclusions: In patients with essential hypertension and LVH, AD was lower than in matched normal controls. Despite the opposing pharmacological mechanisms utilised across the treatment groups, the improvement in AD was similar, suggesting that blood pressure reduction per se may be more important than RAAS and SNS inhibition for the improvement of aortic remodelling.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aged
Amlodipine administration & dosage
Aorta, Thoracic drug effects
Aorta, Thoracic pathology
Bendroflumethiazide administration & dosage
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Drug Therapy, Combination
Essential Hypertension
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Heart Ventricles pathology
Heart Ventricles physiopathology
Humans
Hypertension complications
Hypertension physiopathology
Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular diagnosis
Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular etiology
Imidazoles administration & dosage
Male
Middle Aged
Sympatholytics
Treatment Outcome
Valsartan administration & dosage
Vascular Remodeling drug effects
Vascular Stiffness drug effects
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers administration & dosage
Antihypertensive Agents administration & dosage
Aorta, Thoracic physiopathology
Hypertension drug therapy
Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular physiopathology
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine methods
Vascular Remodeling physiology
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1525-6006
- Volume :
- 37
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Clinical and experimental hypertension (New York, N.Y. : 1993)
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 25271354
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.3109/10641963.2014.960974