Back to Search Start Over

[Initial results of adjustable periurethral balloons (ACT™ and pro ACT™) in the treatment of adult stress urinary incontinence with intrinsic sphincter deficiency].

Authors :
Kaboré FA
Gaillet S
Blanc J
Boissier R
Aurier KL
Delaporte V
Coulange C
Lechevallier E
Karsenty G
Source :
Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie [Prog Urol] 2014 Dec; Vol. 24 (17), pp. 1132-8. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Sep 10.
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Objective: To report efficacy and morbidity of periurethral adjustable balloons (PUAB) in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD).<br />Patients and Methods: Retrospective descriptive and analytic patients cohort study was performed from July 2010 to June 2012. We reviewed data from 43 patients (19 women and 24 men). The patients were categorized into 3 groups: i) women, ii) men after prostatectomy, iii) men with neurogenic SUI (prostate in position). Sandvick score and the average of 3 days 24 h Pad test evaluated the efficacy of the device. The patients impression of improvement was assessed in three degrees: completely improved, partially improved, not improved.<br />Results: After a median follow-up of 67 weeks (min. 40, max. 91) a significant improvement of the score of Sandvik was observed (8 to 4, P<0.005). The proportion of dry patients or with one security protection in the three groups was 57.9%, 64.3% and 50% respectively for women, men after prostatectomy, and men with neurological SUI. About 27.9% (12/43) of the patients had post-operative complications. These complications required an explantation of the PUAB in 11/12 patients among whom 7/11 (63.6%) had a delayed re-implantation of the device.<br />Conclusion: In this series, the overall efficacy observed was 67.4% with a post-operative complication rate of 27.9%. The device adjustment was done in consultation as well as the complications management and the explantation when necessary.<br />Level of Evidence: 4.<br /> (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
French
ISSN :
1166-7087
Volume :
24
Issue :
17
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
25217479
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2014.08.004