Back to Search Start Over

Modest rise in chlamydia and gonorrhoea testing did not increase case detection in a clinical HIV cohort in Ontario, Canada.

Authors :
Burchell AN
Grewal R
Allen VG
Gardner SL
Moravan V
Bayoumi AM
Kaul R
McGee F
Millson MP
Remis RS
Raboud J
Mazzulli T
Rourke SB
Source :
Sexually transmitted infections [Sex Transm Infect] 2014 Dec; Vol. 90 (8), pp. 608-14. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Sep 01.
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Objectives: We described patterns of testing for chlamydia and gonorrhoea infection among persons in specialty HIV care in Ontario, Canada, from 2008 to 2011.<br />Methods: We analysed data from 3165 participants in the OHTN Cohort Study attending one of seven specialty HIV care clinics. We obtained chlamydia and gonorrhoea test results via record linkage with the provincial public health laboratory. We estimated the proportion of participants who underwent testing annually, the positivity rate among those tested and the proportion diagnosed with chlamydia or gonorrhoea among all under observation. We explored risk factors for testing and diagnosis using multiple logistic regression analysis.<br />Results: The proportion tested annually rose from 15.2% (95% CI 13.6% to 16.7%) in 2008 to 27.0% (95% CI 25.3% to 28.6%) in 2011 (p<0.0001). Virtually all were urine-based nucleic acid amplification tests. Testing was more common among men who have sex with men (MSM), younger adults, Toronto residents, persons attending primary care clinics and persons who had tested in the previous year or who had more clinic visits in the current year. We observed a decrease in test positivity rates over time. However, the annual proportion diagnosed remained stable and in 2011 this was 0.97% (95% CI 0.61% to 1.3%) and 0.79% (95% CI 0.46% to 1.1%) for chlamydia and gonorrhoea, respectively. Virtually all cases were among MSM.<br />Conclusions: Chlamydia and gonorrhoea testing increased over time while test positivity rates declined and the overall proportion diagnosed remained stable, suggesting that the modest increase in testing did not improve case detection.<br /> (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1472-3263
Volume :
90
Issue :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Sexually transmitted infections
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
25178285
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2014-051647