Back to Search
Start Over
Scholarly productivity for nursing clinical track faculty.
- Source :
-
Nursing outlook [Nurs Outlook] 2014 Nov-Dec; Vol. 62 (6), pp. 475-81. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Jun 10. - Publication Year :
- 2014
-
Abstract
- Recent years have yielded substantial advancement by clinical track faculty in cohort expansion and collective contributions to the discipline of nursing. As a result, standards for progression and promotion for clinical faculty need to be more fully developed, articulated, and disseminated. Our school formed a task force to examine benchmarks for the progression and promotion of clinical faculty across schools of nursing, with the goal of guiding faculty, reviewers, and decision makers about what constitutes excellence in scholarly productivity. Results from analyses of curriculum vitae of clinical professors or associate professors at six universities with high research activity revealed a variety of productivity among clinical track members, which included notable diversity in the types of scholarly products. Findings from this project help quantify types of scholarship for clinical faculty at the time of promotion. This work provides a springboard for greater understanding of the contributions of clinical track faculty to nursing practice.<br /> (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Education, Nursing organization & administration
Educational Measurement methods
Humans
Quality Improvement statistics & numerical data
United States
Benchmarking statistics & numerical data
Clinical Nursing Research organization & administration
Education, Nursing statistics & numerical data
Educational Measurement statistics & numerical data
Efficiency, Organizational statistics & numerical data
Faculty, Nursing statistics & numerical data
Research Report
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1528-3968
- Volume :
- 62
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Nursing outlook
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 25015410
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2014.05.006