Back to Search
Start Over
Analyses of clinicopathological, molecular, and prognostic associations of KRAS codon 61 and codon 146 mutations in colorectal cancer: cohort study and literature review.
- Source :
-
Molecular cancer [Mol Cancer] 2014 May 31; Vol. 13, pp. 135. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 May 31. - Publication Year :
- 2014
-
Abstract
- Background: KRAS mutations in codons 12 and 13 are established predictive biomarkers for anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer. Previous studies suggest that KRAS codon 61 and 146 mutations may also predict resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer. However, clinicopathological, molecular, and prognostic features of colorectal carcinoma with KRAS codon 61 or 146 mutation remain unclear.<br />Methods: We utilized a molecular pathological epidemiology database of 1267 colon and rectal cancers in the Nurse's Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. We examined KRAS mutations in codons 12, 13, 61 and 146 (assessed by pyrosequencing), in relation to clinicopathological features, and tumor molecular markers, including BRAF and PIK3CA mutations, CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), LINE-1 methylation, and microsatellite instability (MSI). Survival analyses were performed in 1067 BRAF-wild-type cancers to avoid confounding by BRAF mutation. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compute mortality hazard ratio, adjusting for potential confounders, including disease stage, PIK3CA mutation, CIMP, LINE-1 hypomethylation, and MSI.<br />Results: KRAS codon 61 mutations were detected in 19 cases (1.5%), and codon 146 mutations in 40 cases (3.2%). Overall KRAS mutation prevalence in colorectal cancers was 40% (=505/1267). Of interest, compared to KRAS-wild-type, overall, KRAS-mutated cancers more frequently exhibited cecal location (24% vs. 12% in KRAS-wild-type; P < 0.0001), CIMP-low (49% vs. 32% in KRAS-wild-type; P < 0.0001), and PIK3CA mutations (24% vs. 11% in KRAS-wild-type; P < 0.0001). These trends were evident irrespective of mutated codon, though statistical power was limited for codon 61 mutants. Neither KRAS codon 61 nor codon 146 mutation was significantly associated with clinical outcome or prognosis in univariate or multivariate analysis [colorectal cancer-specific mortality hazard ratio (HR) = 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.29-2.26 for codon 61 mutation; colorectal cancer-specific mortality HR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.42-1.78 for codon 146 mutation].<br />Conclusions: Tumors with KRAS mutations in codons 61 and 146 account for an appreciable proportion (approximately 5%) of colorectal cancers, and their clinicopathological and molecular features appear generally similar to KRAS codon 12 or 13 mutated cancers. To further assess clinical utility of KRAS codon 61 and 146 testing, large-scale trials are warranted.
- Subjects :
- Aged
Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases
Cohort Studies
Colorectal Neoplasms diagnosis
Colorectal Neoplasms mortality
CpG Islands
DNA Methylation
ErbB Receptors genetics
Female
Gene Expression
Humans
Long Interspersed Nucleotide Elements genetics
Male
Middle Aged
Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases genetics
Proportional Hazards Models
Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf genetics
Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)
Survival Analysis
Codon
Colorectal Neoplasms genetics
Colorectal Neoplasms pathology
Mutation
Proto-Oncogene Proteins genetics
ras Proteins genetics
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1476-4598
- Volume :
- 13
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Molecular cancer
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 24885062
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-13-135