Back to Search Start Over

Immunohistochemistry practices of cytopathology laboratories: a survey of participants in the College of American Pathologists Nongynecologic Cytopathology Education Program.

Authors :
Fischer AH
Schwartz MR
Moriarty AT
Wilbur DC
Souers R
Fatheree L
Booth CN
Clayton AC
Kurtyz DF
Padmanabhan V
Crothers BA
Source :
Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine [Arch Pathol Lab Med] 2014 Sep; Vol. 138 (9), pp. 1167-72. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 May 19.
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Context: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is important for cytology but poses special challenges because preanalytic conditions may differ from the conditions of IHC-positive controls.<br />Objective: To broadly survey cytology laboratories to quantify preanalytic platforms for cytology IHC and identify problems with particular platforms or antigens. To discover how validation guidelines for HER2 testing have affected cytology.<br />Design: A voluntary survey of cytology IHC practices was sent to 1899 cytology laboratories participating in the College of American Pathologists Nongynecologic Cytopathology Education Program in the fall of 2009.<br />Results: A total of 818 laboratories (43%) responded to the survey by April 2010. Three hundred fourty-five of 791 respondents (44%) performed IHC on cytology specimens. Seventeen different fixation and processing platforms prior to antibody reaction were reported. A total of 59.2% of laboratories reported differences between the platforms for cytology specimens and positive controls, but most (155 of 184; 84%) did not alter antibody dilutions or antigen retrieval for cytology IHC. When asked to name 2 antibodies for which staining conditions differed between cytology and surgical samples, there were 18 responses listing 14 antibodies. A total of 30.6% of laboratories performing IHC offered HER2 testing before publication of the 2007 College of American Pathologists/American Society of Clinical Oncologists guidelines, compared with 33.6% afterward, with increased performance of testing by reference laboratories. Three laboratories validated a nonformalin HER2 platform.<br />Conclusions: The platforms for cytology IHC and positive controls differ for most laboratories, yet conditions are uncommonly adjusted for cytology specimens. Except for the unsuitability of air-dried smears for HER2 testing, the survey did not reveal evidence of systematic problems with any antibody or platform.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1543-2165
Volume :
138
Issue :
9
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
24840035
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2013-0259-CP