Early-generation versus new-generation drug-eluting stents in isolated chronic total occlusion: on the road to extinction?

Background: The performance of second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) versus first-generation DES implantation in patients with stable angina and single chronic total occlusion (CTO) has not yet been studied. Herein, we sought to investigate whether a successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for CTO using second-generation versus first-generation polymer-coated DES improved outcomes in a setting of isolated CTO.
Methods: Among 7765 patients undergoing elective PCIs between 2006 and 2011, a total of 742 single CTOs were identified. Of these, 496 had a successful PCI and 193 were implanted with DESs. The major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) records were extracted from the national administrative database and all patients were linked to the 2-year follow-up.
Results: When compared to first-generation DES implantation, second-generation implantation once significantly reduced risk of MACE, both at 1-year (hazard ratio [HR], 0.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06-0.36; P=.01) and 2-year follow-up (HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.13-0.56; P=.01). The symptom-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) also occurred less frequently in patients with second-generation DES vs first-generation DES within 2 years of follow-up (HR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.05-0.44; P=.03). The substantial 2-year benefit of second-generation DES over first-generation DES also persisted after incorporating a propensity score analysis for MACE (HR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.08-0.72; P=.01) and TLR (HR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.05-0.49; P=.04).
Conclusions: Successful PCI for CTO using thin-strut polymer-coated DES vs early-generation DES implantation improves outcomes after recanalization of isolated CTO in a setting of stable angina.