[The effects of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and intermittent haemodialysis (IHD) in the treatment of dabigatran overdose. Case report].

A 85-year-old man, with CKD (e-GFR 35 mL/min), had been given Dabigatran (a direct thrombin inhibitor) at 110 mg daily dose because of atrial fibrillation. Due to intercurrent diarrhea and dehydration, renal function worsened (e-GFR 11 mL/min) and Dabigatran excretion decreased, thereby inducing drug overload. In this case, Dabigatran must be removed by dialysis, but the most appropriate schedule is still undefined. The effects of both continuous haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) and intermittent haemodialysis (IHD) on plasma Dabigatran (Echarin Chromogenic Assay) were reported. Dialysis clearance of Dabigatran was reported as ratio to urea clearance (Dab/Urea(Cl)). Coagulation was assessed by both DOA-aPTTratio and Thrombin Time-ratio (TTratio). Dabigatran was elevated at 597 ng/mL predialysis (bleeding threshold being 30 ng/mL), and decreased to 96 ng/mL (-84%) after 20 hours of CVVHDF (Urea(Cl) = 67 mL/min). Dab/Urea(Cl) was 0.49. Three hours after dialysis, Dabigatran rebounded to 208 ng/mL. On IHD (Urea(Cl)=238 mL/min), predialysis Dabigatran was 52 ng/mL and decreased to 8 ng/mL (-85%) after 3.5 hours of treatment. Dab/Urea(Cl) was 0.47. Fourteen hours later, Dabigatran rebounded at 19 ng/mL. There was a positive correlation between Dabigatran and TTratio (r = 0.92; p<0.0001), whereas DOA-aPTT did not increase above 2.5 times the reference values, even in face of the highest values of Dabigatran. Therefore, TTratio is more reliable than DOA-aPTT in detecting Dabigatran overdose. Post-dialysis rebound of Dabigatran occurred also with CVVHDF, thereby suggesting that accurate monitoring of both Dabigatran levels and bleeding risk are mandatory, also after long-lasting dialysis sessions.