Back to Search Start Over

Comparing two conditions of administering the six-minute walk test in people with multiple sclerosis.

Authors :
Sandroff BM
Pilutti LA
Dlugonski D
Learmonth YC
Pula JH
Motl RW
Source :
International journal of MS care [Int J MS Care] 2014 Spring; Vol. 16 (1), pp. 48-54.
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Objective: This quasi-experimental study was conducted to determine whether differences existed in the total distance walked and energy expended between two conditions of administering the 6-Minute Walk test (6MW) across different levels of disability in people with multiple sclerosis (MS).<br />Methods: The sample comprised 160 individuals with MS. One group of participants (n = 82) completed a 6MW while wearing a portable metabolic unit (K4b(2), Cosmed, Italy) in a square hallway with four corridors and performing 90° turns. Another group (n = 78) completed a 6MW while wearing the same metabolic unit in a single corridor and performing 180° turns. Main outcome measures included total distance walked (in feet) and oxygen consumption (in milliliters per minute) expressed as 30-second averages for 1 minute before the 6MW and over the entire 6MW. Disability status was assessed using the Patient-Determined Disease Steps scale.<br />Results: Participants undertaking the 6MW in a single corridor (1412 ft) walked 37 ft (2.7%) farther than those undertaking the test in a square hallway (1375 ft), but this difference was not statistically significant (F = 0.45, P = .51). Those completing the 6MW in a single corridor expended more energy than those completing the 6MW in the square hallway with four corridors (F = 3.41, P < .01).<br />Conclusions: Either protocol is acceptable, but researchers should be aware of the additional physiological demands when administering the 6MW in a single corridor with 180° turns.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1537-2073
Volume :
16
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
International journal of MS care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
24688354
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2013-014