Back to Search Start Over

Twitter response to the United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendations against screening with prostate-specific antigen.

Authors :
Prabhu V
Lee T
Loeb S
Holmes JH
Gold HT
Lepor H
Penson DF
Makarov DV
Source :
BJU international [BJU Int] 2015 Jul; Vol. 116 (1), pp. 65-71. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Mar 25.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Objective: To examine public and media response to the draft (October 2011) and finalised (May 2012) recommendations of the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) against prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing via Twitter, a popular social network with over 200 million active users.<br />Materials and Methods: We used a mixed-methods design to analyse posts on Twitter, known as 'tweets'. Using the search term 'prostate cancer', we archived tweets in the 24-h periods following the release of both the draft and the finalised USPSTF recommendations. We recorded tweet rate per h and developed a coding system to assess the type of user and sentiment expressed in tweets and linked articles.<br />Results: After the draft and finalised USPSTF recommendations were released, 2042 and 5357 tweets focused on the USPSTF report, respectively. The tweet rate nearly doubled within 2 h of both announcements. Fewer than 10% of tweets expressed an opinion about screening, and the majority of these were pro-screening during both periods. By contrast, anti-screening articles were tweeted more frequently in both the draft and finalised study periods. Between the draft and the finalised recommendations, the proportion of anti-screening tweets and anti-screening article links increased (P = 0.03 and P < 0.01, respectively).<br />Conclusions: There was increased Twitter activity surrounding the USPSTF draft and finalised recommendations. The percentage of anti-screening tweets and articles appeared to increase, perhaps due to the interval public comment period. Despite this, most tweets did not express an opinion, suggesting a missed opportunity in this important arena for advocacy.<br /> (© 2014 The Authors BJU International © 2014 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1464-410X
Volume :
116
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
BJU international
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
24661474
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12748