Back to Search Start Over

Predicting successful intended vaginal delivery after previous caesarean section: external validation of two predictive models in a Dutch nationwide registration-based cohort with a high intended vaginal delivery rate.

Authors :
Schoorel EN
Melman S
van Kuijk SM
Grobman WA
Kwee A
Mol BW
Nijhuis JG
Smits LJ
Aardenburg R
de Boer K
Delemarre FM
van Dooren IM
Franssen MT
Kleiverda G
Kaplan M
Kuppens SM
Lim FT
Sikkema JM
Smid-Koopman E
Visser H
Vrouenraets FP
Woiski M
Hermens RP
Scheepers HC
Source :
BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology [BJOG] 2014 Jun; Vol. 121 (7), pp. 840-7; discussion 847. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Feb 18.
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Objective: To externally validate two models from the USA (entry-to-care [ETC] and close-to-delivery [CTD]) that predict successful intended vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) for the Dutch population.<br />Design: A nationwide registration-based cohort study.<br />Setting: Seventeen hospitals in the Netherlands.<br />Population: Seven hundred and sixty-three pregnant women, each with one previous caesarean section and a viable singleton cephalic pregnancy without a contraindication for an intended VBAC.<br />Methods: The ETC model comprises the variables maternal age, prepregnancy body mass index (BMI), ethnicity, previous vaginal delivery, previous VBAC and previous nonprogressive labour. The CTD model replaces prepregnancy BMI with third-trimester BMI and adds estimated gestational age at delivery, hypertensive disease of pregnancy, cervical examination and induction of labour. We included consecutive medical records of eligible women who delivered in 2010. For validation, individual probabilities of women who had an intended VBAC were calculated.<br />Main Outcome Measures: Discriminative performance was assessed with the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic and predictive performance was assessed with calibration plots and the Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) statistic.<br />Results: Five hundred and fifteen (67%) of the 763 women had an intended VBAC; 72% of these (371) had an actual VBAC. The AUCs of the ETC and CTD models were 68% (95% CI 63-72%) and 72% (95% CI 67-76%), respectively. The H-L statistic showed a P-value of 0.167 for the ETC model and P = 0.356 for the CTD model, indicating no lack of fit.<br />Conclusion: External validation of two predictive models developed in the USA revealed an adequate performance within the Dutch population.<br /> (© 2014 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1471-0528
Volume :
121
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
24533534
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12605