Back to Search Start Over

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the additional benefit of local prophylactic antibiotic therapy for infection rates in open tibia fractures treated with intramedullary nailing.

Authors :
Craig J
Fuchs T
Jenks M
Fleetwood K
Franz D
Iff J
Raschke M
Source :
International orthopaedics [Int Orthop] 2014 May; Vol. 38 (5), pp. 1025-30. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Feb 15.
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Purpose: This analysis compared the rate of deep wound infections in patients with open tibia fractures, treated with intramedullary nails, receiving additional locally-delivered antibiotics to those receiving standard care.<br />Methods: Two systematic literature searches identified studies reporting infection rates in patients treated with intramedullary nails for tibia fractures receiving systemic antibiotics only (search one) and in patients receiving adjunctive locally-administered antibiotics peri-operatively at the tissue-implant interface (search two). After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 14 and seven papers from searches one and two, respectively, were included in meta-analyses.<br />Results: The absolute rate of infection was lower for all Gustilo-Anderson grades of tibia fractures when local antibiotics were administered as adjunctive prophylactic therapy. For severe fractures, classified as GAIII fractures, patients receiving systemic antibiotics only had an infection rate of 14.4 % [95 % CI: 10.5 %, 18.5 %]; adding local antibiotics reduced the rate to 2.4 % [0.0 %, 9.4 %], with an odds ratio of 0.17. Risk of deep wound infections increased with severity of fracture, rising to over 31 % in GIIIB&C fractures for patients receiving systematic antibiotics only, but to below 9 % with additional local antibiotics.<br />Conclusion: The findings support consideration of augmenting the antibiotic prophylaxis regimen to include locally-delivered antibiotics. Patients with severe fractures will obtain greatest benefit from infections avoided. No trial directly compared the two treatments for open tibia fractures, limiting the ability to attribute the differences in observed infection rates directly to the treatments themselves. A large comparative study to improve the evidence on relative effect size is merited.<br />Level of Evidence: Level III.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1432-5195
Volume :
38
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
International orthopaedics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
24531401
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2293-2