Back to Search Start Over

HUMeral shaft fractures: measuring recovery after operative versus non-operative treatment (HUMMER): a multicenter comparative observational study.

Authors :
Mahabier KC
Van Lieshout EM
Bolhuis HW
Bos PK
Bronkhorst MW
Bruijninckx MM
De Haan J
Deenik AR
Dwars BJ
Eversdijk MG
Goslings JC
Haverlag R
Heetveld MJ
Kerver AJ
Kolkman KA
Leenhouts PA
Meylaerts SA
Onstenk R
Poeze M
Poolman RW
Punt BJ
Roerdink WH
Roukema GR
Sintenie JB
Soesman NM
Tanka AK
Ten Holder EJ
Van der Elst M
Van der Heijden FH
Van der Linden FM
Van der Zwaal P
Van Dijk JP
Van Jonbergen HP
Verleisdonk EJ
Vroemen JP
Waleboer M
Wittich P
Zuidema WP
Polinder S
Verhofstad MH
Den Hartog D
Source :
BMC musculoskeletal disorders [BMC Musculoskelet Disord] 2014 Feb 11; Vol. 15, pp. 39. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Feb 11.
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Background: Fractures of the humeral shaft are associated with a profound temporary (and in the elderly sometimes even permanent) impairment of independence and quality of life. These fractures can be treated operatively or non-operatively, but the optimal tailored treatment is an unresolved problem. As no high-quality comparative randomized or observational studies are available, a recent Cochrane review concluded there is no evidence of sufficient scientific quality available to inform the decision to operate or not. Since randomized controlled trials for this injury have shown feasibility issues, this study is designed to provide the best achievable evidence to answer this unresolved problem. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate functional recovery after operative versus non-operative treatment in adult patients who sustained a humeral shaft fracture. Secondary aims include the effect of treatment on pain, complications, generic health-related quality of life, time to resumption of activities of daily living and work, and cost-effectiveness. The main hypothesis is that operative treatment will result in faster recovery.<br />Methods/design: The design of the study will be a multicenter prospective observational study of 400 patients who have sustained a humeral shaft fracture, AO type 12A or 12B. Treatment decision (i.e., operative or non-operative) will be left to the discretion of the treating surgeon. Critical elements of treatment will be registered and outcome will be monitored at regular intervals over the subsequent 12 months. The primary outcome measure is the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score. Secondary outcome measures are the Constant score, pain level at both sides, range of motion of the elbow and shoulder joint at both sides, radiographic healing, rate of complications and (secondary) interventions, health-related quality of life (Short-Form 36 and EuroQol-5D), time to resumption of ADL/work, and cost-effectiveness. Data will be analyzed using univariate and multivariable analyses (including mixed effects regression analysis). The cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed from a societal perspective.<br />Discussion: Successful completion of this trial will provide evidence on the effectiveness of operative versus non-operative treatment of patients with a humeral shaft fracture.<br />Trial Registration: The trial is registered at the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR3617).

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1471-2474
Volume :
15
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
BMC musculoskeletal disorders
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
24517194
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-39