Back to Search
Start Over
Improvement in toxicity in high risk prostate cancer patients treated with image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy compared to 3D conformal radiotherapy without daily image guidance.
- Source :
-
Radiation oncology (London, England) [Radiat Oncol] 2014 Feb 04; Vol. 9, pp. 44. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Feb 04. - Publication Year :
- 2014
-
Abstract
- Background: Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) facilitates the delivery of a very precise radiation dose. In this study we compare the toxicity and biochemical progression-free survival between patients treated with daily image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) and 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) without daily image guidance for high risk prostate cancer (PCa).<br />Methods: A total of 503 high risk PCa patients treated with radiotherapy (RT) and endocrine treatment between 2000 and 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. 115 patients were treated with 3DCRT, and 388 patients were treated with IG-IMRT. 3DCRT patients were treated to 76 Gy and without daily image guidance and with 1-2 cm PTV margins. IG-IMRT patients were treated to 78 Gy based on daily image guidance of fiducial markers, and the PTV margins were 5-7 mm. Furthermore, the dose-volume constraints to both the rectum and bladder were changed with the introduction of IG-IMRT.<br />Results: The 2-year actuarial likelihood of developing grade > = 2 GI toxicity following RT was 57.3% in 3DCRT patients and 5.8% in IG-IMRT patients (p < 0.001). For GU toxicity the numbers were 41.8% and 29.7%, respectively (p = 0.011). On multivariate analysis, 3DCRT was associated with a significantly increased risk of developing grade > = 2 GI toxicity compared to IG-IMRT (p < 0.001, HR = 11.59 [CI: 6.67-20.14]). 3DCRT was also associated with an increased risk of developing GU toxicity compared to IG-IMRT.The 3-year actuarial biochemical progression-free survival probability was 86.0% for 3DCRT and 90.3% for IG-IMRT (p = 0.386). On multivariate analysis there was no difference in biochemical progression-free survival between 3DCRT and IG-IMRT.<br />Conclusion: The difference in toxicity can be attributed to the combination of the IMRT technique with reduced dose to organs-at-risk, daily image guidance and margin reduction.
- Subjects :
- Aged
Disease-Free Survival
Fiducial Markers
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Organs at Risk
Prostatic Neoplasms epidemiology
Radiation Injuries epidemiology
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted instrumentation
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted methods
Radiotherapy, Conformal instrumentation
Radiotherapy, Conformal methods
Radiotherapy, Image-Guided instrumentation
Radiotherapy, Image-Guided methods
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated instrumentation
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated methods
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Imaging, Three-Dimensional methods
Prostatic Neoplasms radiotherapy
Radiation Injuries etiology
Radiotherapy, Conformal adverse effects
Radiotherapy, Image-Guided adverse effects
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated adverse effects
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1748-717X
- Volume :
- 9
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Radiation oncology (London, England)
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 24495815
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-44