Back to Search Start Over

Profiling the prognosis of gastric cancer patients: is it worth correlating the survival with the clinical/pathological and molecular features of gastric cancers?

Authors :
Lorenzon L
Mercantini P
Ferri M
La Torre M
Sparagna A
Balducci G
Tarantino G
Romiti A
Pilozzi E
Ziparo V
Source :
TheScientificWorldJournal [ScientificWorldJournal] 2013 Dec 24; Vol. 2013, pp. 196541. Date of Electronic Publication: 2013 Dec 24 (Print Publication: 2013).
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

Background: The prognosis of gastric cancer patients still remains poor. The aim of this study was investigating the prognostic value of several clinical/pathological/molecular features in a consecutive series of gastric cancers.<br />Methods: 150 R0 gastrectomies plus 77 gastric cancer patients evaluated for the HER2 overexpression were selected. Survival was calculated and patients stratified according to the stage, the T-stage, the LNRs, the LNH, and the HER2 scoring system. ROC curves were calculated in order to compare the performance of the LRN and LNH systems.<br />Results: Prognosis correlated with the stage and with the T-stage. We documented a statistical correlation between the LNRs and the survival. Conversely, a LNH > 15 did not correlate with the outcomes. The ROC curves documented a significant performance of the LRN system, whereas a statistical correlation was documented for the LNH exclusively with the endpoint of disease-free survival. We documented a trend of worse prognosis for patients with an HER2 overexpression, even though it was not of statistical value.<br />Conclusion: The LNR and the evaluation of the HER2 overexpression might be useful since they correlate with survival, might identify patients with a higher risk of recurrence, and might select patients for a tailored medical treatment.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1537-744X
Volume :
2013
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
TheScientificWorldJournal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
24453810
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/196541