Back to Search
Start Over
A multicentric study regarding the use of hormone therapy during female mid-age (REDLINC VI).
- Source :
-
Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society [Climacteric] 2014 Aug; Vol. 17 (4), pp. 433-41. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Jan 29. - Publication Year :
- 2014
-
Abstract
- Background: Menopausal hormone therapy (HT) has shown benefits for women; however, associated drawbacks (i.e. risks, costs, fears) have currently determined its low use.<br />Objective: To determine the prevalence of current HT use among mid-aged women and describe the characteristics of those who have never used, have abandoned or are currently using HT. In addition, reasons for not using HT were analyzed.<br />Method: This was a cross-sectional study that analyzed a total of 6731 otherwise healthy women (45-59 years old) of 15 cities in 11 Latin American countries. Participants were requested to fill out the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) and a questionnaire containing sociodemographic data and items regarding the menopause and HT use.<br />Results: The prevalence of current HT use was 12.5%. Oral HT (43.7%) was the most frequently used type of HT, followed by transdermal types (17.7%). The main factors related to the current use of HT included: positive perceptions regarding HT (odds ratio (OR) 11.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 9.41-14.13), being postmenopausal (OR 3.47, 95% CI 2.75-4.36) and having a better socioeconomic level. A total of 48.8% of surveyed women had used HT in the past, but abandoned it due to symptom improvement or being unconcerned; fear of cancer or any other secondary effects were also reported but in less than 10%. Among women who had never used HT, 28% reported the lack of medical prescription as the main reason, followed by the absence of symptoms (27.8%). Among those reporting lack of prescription as the main reason for not using HT, 30.6% currently had severe menopausal symptoms (total MRS score > 16); 19.5% of women were using alternative 'natural' therapies, with 35.1% of them displaying severe menopausal symptoms as compared to a 22.5% observed among current HT users.<br />Conclusion: The use of HT has not regained the rates observed a decade ago. Positive perceptions regarding HT were related to a higher use. Lack of medical prescription was the main reason for not using HT among non-users, many of whom were currently displaying severe menopausal symptoms.
- Subjects :
- Confidence Intervals
Cross-Sectional Studies
Demography
Fear
Female
Humans
Latin America
Menopause psychology
Middle Aged
Needs Assessment
Odds Ratio
Prevalence
Quality of Life
Risk Assessment
Socioeconomic Factors
Surveys and Questionnaires
Women's Health
Estrogen Replacement Therapy economics
Estrogen Replacement Therapy methods
Estrogen Replacement Therapy psychology
Estrogen Replacement Therapy statistics & numerical data
Hot Flashes epidemiology
Hot Flashes etiology
Hot Flashes physiopathology
Hot Flashes prevention & control
Hot Flashes psychology
Practice Patterns, Physicians' statistics & numerical data
Treatment Refusal psychology
Treatment Refusal statistics & numerical data
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1473-0804
- Volume :
- 17
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 24443950
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.3109/13697137.2014.882305