Back to Search Start Over

Objective comparison of particle tracking methods.

Authors :
Chenouard N
Smal I
de Chaumont F
Maška M
Sbalzarini IF
Gong Y
Cardinale J
Carthel C
Coraluppi S
Winter M
Cohen AR
Godinez WJ
Rohr K
Kalaidzidis Y
Liang L
Duncan J
Shen H
Xu Y
Magnusson KE
Jaldén J
Blau HM
Paul-Gilloteaux P
Roudot P
Kervrann C
Waharte F
Tinevez JY
Shorte SL
Willemse J
Celler K
van Wezel GP
Dan HW
Tsai YS
Ortiz de Solórzano C
Olivo-Marin JC
Meijering E
Source :
Nature methods [Nat Methods] 2014 Mar; Vol. 11 (3), pp. 281-9. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Jan 19.
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Particle tracking is of key importance for quantitative analysis of intracellular dynamic processes from time-lapse microscopy image data. Because manually detecting and following large numbers of individual particles is not feasible, automated computational methods have been developed for these tasks by many groups. Aiming to perform an objective comparison of methods, we gathered the community and organized an open competition in which participating teams applied their own methods independently to a commonly defined data set including diverse scenarios. Performance was assessed using commonly defined measures. Although no single method performed best across all scenarios, the results revealed clear differences between the various approaches, leading to notable practical conclusions for users and developers.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1548-7105
Volume :
11
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Nature methods
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
24441936
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2808