Back to Search
Start Over
Conscientious objection and refusal to provide reproductive healthcare: a White Paper examining prevalence, health consequences, and policy responses.
- Source :
-
International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics [Int J Gynaecol Obstet] 2013 Dec; Vol. 123 Suppl 3, pp. S41-56. - Publication Year :
- 2013
-
Abstract
- Background: Global Doctors for Choice-a transnational network of physician advocates for reproductive health and rights-began exploring the phenomenon of conscience-based refusal of reproductive healthcare as a result of increasing reports of harms worldwide. The present White Paper examines the prevalence and impact of such refusal and reviews policy efforts to balance individual conscience, autonomy in reproductive decision making, safeguards for health, and professional medical integrity.<br />Objectives and Search Strategy: The White Paper draws on medical, public health, legal, ethical, and social science literature published between 1998 and 2013 in English, French, German, Italian, Portuguese, and Spanish. Estimates of prevalence are difficult to obtain, as there is no consensus about criteria for refuser status and no standardized definition of the practice, and the studies have sampling and other methodologic limitations. The White Paper reviews these data and offers logical frameworks to represent the possible health and health system consequences of conscience-based refusal to provide abortion; assisted reproductive technologies; contraception; treatment in cases of maternal health risk and inevitable pregnancy loss; and prenatal diagnosis. It concludes by categorizing legal, regulatory, and other policy responses to the practice.<br />Conclusions: Empirical evidence is essential for varied political actors as they respond with policies or regulations to the competing concerns at stake. Further research and training in diverse geopolitical settings are required. With dual commitments toward their own conscience and their obligations to patients' health and rights, providers and professional medical/public health societies must lead attempts to respond to conscience-based refusal and to safeguard reproductive health, medical integrity, and women's lives.<br /> (Copyright © 2013 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Abortion, Legal statistics & numerical data
Contraception ethics
Female
Global Health
Humans
Patient Advocacy
Pregnancy
Refusal to Treat ethics
Reproductive Health Services ethics
Social Responsibility
Women's Rights
Contraception statistics & numerical data
Health Policy
Refusal to Treat statistics & numerical data
Reproductive Health Services statistics & numerical data
Women's Health statistics & numerical data
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1879-3479
- Volume :
- 123 Suppl 3
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 24332234
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(13)60002-8