Back to Search
Start Over
Modified single-patch compared with two-patch repair of complete atrioventricular septal defect.
- Source :
-
The Annals of thoracic surgery [Ann Thorac Surg] 2014 Feb; Vol. 97 (2), pp. 666-71. Date of Electronic Publication: 2013 Nov 20. - Publication Year :
- 2014
-
Abstract
- Background: We compared the outcomes of modified single-patch and two-patch surgical repair of complete atrioventricular septal defect (CAVSD) on left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) diameter and on left atrioventricular valve (LAVV) coaptation.<br />Methods: We reviewed retrospectively postoperative 2-dimensional echocardiograms of all CAVSD patients who underwent modified single-patch or two-patch repair between 2005 and 2011. We measured the leaflet coaptation length of the LAVV in the apical four-chamber view. The LVOT was measured in the long axis view.<br />Results: Fifty-one patients underwent CAVSD repair at a median age of 4 months (range, 1 to 9 months) (single-patch, n=29; two-patch, n=22). The images from 46 echocardiograms were adequate for analysis. Modified single-patch repair required significantly shorter bypass time (102.0±33.6 vs 152.9±39.5 minutes, p<0.001) and ischemic time (69.0±21.7 vs 106.9±29.7 minutes, p<0.001) than did two-patch repair. The indexed coaptation length of the septal and lateral leaflets was not different between single-patch and two-patch (3.1±2.3 vs 4.1±3.1 mm/m2, p=0.25; 2.3±2.3 vs 3.3±3.0 mm/m2, p=0.21). Indexed LVOT diameter was not different in the two groups (26.1±5.2 vs 28.5±7.1 mm/m2, p=0.22). There was no hospital or late death during the median follow-up time of 35 months (range, 1 to 69 months). Five patients underwent reoperation after single-patch repair (3 with residual ventricular septal defect [VSD] and LAVV regurgitation, 1 with residual VSD, 1 with pacemaker implantation). After the two-patch repair, 1 patient required reoperation for a residual VSD and right atrioventricular valve regurgitation (p=0.22).<br />Conclusions: The modified single-patch repair was performed with significantly shorter bypass time and myocardial ischemic time. The postoperative LVOT diameter and LAVV leaflet coaptation length were not significantly different between techniques.<br /> (Copyright © 2014 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1552-6259
- Volume :
- 97
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- The Annals of thoracic surgery
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 24266947
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.09.084