Back to Search Start Over

How Accurate is the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicator for Hospital-Acquired Pressure Ulcer in a National Sample of Records?

Authors :
Zrelak PA
Utter GH
Tancredi DJ
Mayer LG
Cerese J
Cuny J
Romano PS
Source :
Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality [J Healthc Qual] 2015 Sep-Oct; Vol. 37 (5), pp. 287-97.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

In 2008, we conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study to determine the test characteristics of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality patient safety indicator (PSI) for hospital-acquired pressure ulcer (PU). We sampled 1,995 inpatient records that met PSI 3 criteria and 4,007 records assigned to 14 DRGs with the highest empirical rates of PSI 3, which did not meet PSI 3 criteria, from 32 U.S. academic hospitals. We estimated the positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, and specificity of PSI 3 using both the software version contemporary to the hospitalizations (v3.1) and an approximation of the current version (v4.4). Of records that met PSI 3 version 3.1 criteria, 572 (PPV 28.3%; 95% CI 23.6-32.9%) were true positive. PU that was present on admission (POA) accounted for 76% of the false-positive records. Estimated sensitivity was 48.2% (95% CI 41.0-55.3%) and specificity 71.4% (95% CI 68.3-74.5%). Reclassifying records based on reported POA information and PU stage to approximate version 4.4 of PSI 3 improved sensitivity (78.6%; 95% CI 62.7-94.5%) and specificity (98.0; 95% CI 97.1-98.9%). In conclusion, accounting for POA information and PU staging to approximate newer versions of the PSI software (v4.3) moderately improves validity.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1945-1474
Volume :
37
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
24118246
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/jhq.12052