Back to Search Start Over

Better leukemia-free and overall survival in AML in first remission following cyclophosphamide in combination with busulfan compared with TBI.

Authors :
Copelan EA
Hamilton BK
Avalos B
Ahn KW
Bolwell BJ
Zhu X
Aljurf M
van Besien K
Bredeson C
Cahn JY
Costa LJ
de Lima M
Gale RP
Hale GA
Halter J
Hamadani M
Inamoto Y
Kamble RT
Litzow MR
Loren AW
Marks DI
Olavarria E
Roy V
Sabloff M
Savani BN
Seftel M
Schouten HC
Ustun C
Waller EK
Weisdorf DJ
Wirk B
Horowitz MM
Arora M
Szer J
Cortes J
Kalaycio ME
Maziarz RT
Saber W
Source :
Blood [Blood] 2013 Dec 05; Vol. 122 (24), pp. 3863-70. Date of Electronic Publication: 2013 Sep 24.
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

Cyclophosphamide combined with total body irradiation (Cy/TBI) or busulfan (BuCy) are the most widely used myeloablative conditioning regimens for allotransplants. Recent data regarding their comparative effectiveness are lacking. We analyzed data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research for 1230 subjects receiving a first hematopoietic cell transplant from a human leukocyte antigen-matched sibling or from an unrelated donor during the years 2000 to 2006 for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR) after conditioning with Cy/TBI or oral or intravenous (IV) BuCy. Multivariate analysis showed significantly less nonrelapse mortality (relative risk [RR] = 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39-0.86; P = .007), and relapse after, but not before, 1 year posttransplant (RR = 0.23; 95% CI: 0.08-0.65; P = .006), and better leukemia-free survival (RR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.55-0.88; P = .003) and survival (RR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.52-0.88; P = .003) in persons receiving IV, but not oral, Bu compared with TBI. In combination with Cy, IV Bu is associated with superior outcomes compared with TBI in patients with AML in first CR.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1528-0020
Volume :
122
Issue :
24
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Blood
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
24065243
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2013-07-514448