Back to Search
Start Over
Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe added to atorvastatin versus atorvastatin uptitration or switching to rosuvastatin in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.
- Source :
-
The American journal of cardiology [Am J Cardiol] 2013 Dec 15; Vol. 112 (12), pp. 1885-95. Date of Electronic Publication: 2013 Sep 21. - Publication Year :
- 2013
-
Abstract
- Hypercholesterolemic patients (n = 1,547) at high atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels ≥100 and ≤160 mg/dl while treated with atorvastatin 10 mg/day entered a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, clinical trial using two 6-week study periods. Period I compared the efficacy/safety of (1) adding ezetimibe 10 mg (ezetimibe) to stable atorvastatin 10 mg, (2) doubling atorvastatin to 20 mg, or (3) switching to rosuvastatin 10 mg. Subjects in the latter 2 groups who persisted with elevated LDL-C levels (≥100 and ≤160 mg/dl) after period I, entered period II; subjects on atorvastatin 20 mg had ezetimibe added to their atorvastatin 20 mg, or uptitrated their atorvastatin to 40 mg; subjects on rosuvastatin 10 mg switched to atorvastatin 20 mg plus ezetimibe or uptitrated their rosuvastatin to 20 mg. Some subjects on atorvastatin 10 mg plus ezetimibe continued the same treatment into period II. At the end of period I, ezetimibe plus atorvastatin 10 mg reduced LDL-C significantly more than atorvastatin 20 mg or rosuvastatin 10 mg (22.2% vs 9.5% or 13.0%, respectively, p <0.001). At the end of period II, ezetimibe plus atorvastatin 20 mg reduced LDL-C significantly more than atorvastatin 40 mg (17.4% vs 6.9%, p <0.001); switching from rosuvastatin 10 mg to ezetimibe plus atorvastatin 20 mg reduced LDL-C significantly more than uptitrating to rosuvastatin 20 mg (17.1% vs 7.5%, p <0.001). Relative to comparative treatments, ezetimibe added to atorvastatin 10 mg (period I) or atorvastatin 20 mg (period II) produced significantly greater percent attainment of LDL-C targets <100 or <70 mg/dl, and significantly greater percent reductions in total cholesterol, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, most lipid and lipoprotein ratios, and apolipoprotein B (except ezetimibe plus atorvastatin 20 vs atorvastatin 40 mg). Reports of adverse experiences were generally similar among groups. In conclusion, treatment of hypercholesterolemic subjects at high cardiovascular risk with ezetimibe added to atorvastatin 10 or 20 mg produced significantly greater improvements in key lipid parameters and significantly greater attainment of LDL-C treatment targets than doubling atorvastatin or switching to (or doubling) rosuvastatin at the compared doses.<br /> (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Aged
Anticholesteremic Agents therapeutic use
Atorvastatin
Azetidines therapeutic use
Cholesterol, LDL blood
Double-Blind Method
Drug Therapy, Combination
Ezetimibe
Female
Fluorobenzenes therapeutic use
Heptanoic Acids therapeutic use
Humans
Hypercholesterolemia blood
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Pyrimidines therapeutic use
Pyrroles therapeutic use
Rosuvastatin Calcium
Sulfonamides therapeutic use
Anticholesteremic Agents administration & dosage
Azetidines administration & dosage
Fluorobenzenes administration & dosage
Heptanoic Acids administration & dosage
Hypercholesterolemia drug therapy
Pyrimidines administration & dosage
Pyrroles administration & dosage
Sulfonamides administration & dosage
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1879-1913
- Volume :
- 112
- Issue :
- 12
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- The American journal of cardiology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 24063830
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.08.031