Back to Search Start Over

Challenges relating to solid tumour brain metastases in clinical trials, part 2: neurocognitive, neurological, and quality-of-life outcomes. A report from the RANO group.

Authors :
Lin NU
Wefel JS
Lee EQ
Schiff D
van den Bent MJ
Soffietti R
Suh JH
Vogelbaum MA
Mehta MP
Dancey J
Linskey ME
Camidge DR
Aoyama H
Brown PD
Chang SM
Kalkanis SN
Barani IJ
Baumert BG
Gaspar LE
Hodi FS
Macdonald DR
Wen PY
Source :
The Lancet. Oncology [Lancet Oncol] 2013 Sep; Vol. 14 (10), pp. e407-16.
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

Neurocognitive function, neurological symptoms, functional independence, and health-related quality of life are major concerns for patients with brain metastases. The inclusion of these endpoints in trials of brain metastases and the methods by which these measures are assessed vary substantially. If functional independence or health-related quality of life are planned as key study outcomes, then the reliability and validity of these endpoints can be crucial because methodological issues might affect the interpretation and acceptance of findings. The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group is an independent, international, and collaborative effort to improve the design of clinical trials in patients with brain tumours. In this report, the second in a two-part series, we review clinical trials of brain metastases in relation to measures of clinical benefit and provide a framework for the design and conduct of future trials.<br /> (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1474-5488
Volume :
14
Issue :
10
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Lancet. Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
23993385
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70308-5