Back to Search Start Over

Smart meters and routers radiofrequency disturbances study with pacemakers and implantable cardiac defibrillators.

Authors :
Ostiguy G
Black T
Bluteau LJ
Dupont L
Dyrda K
Girard G
Nguyen DH
Plante M
Thibault B
Source :
Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE [Pacing Clin Electrophysiol] 2013 Nov; Vol. 36 (11), pp. 1417-26. Date of Electronic Publication: 2013 Jul 22.
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

Background: There is no scientific literature that examines radiofrequency (RF) interference from Smart Meters with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). The objective of this in vitro study was to assess any potential interference with Medtronic CIEDs (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA).<br />Methods: In the Quebec testing, five models of Medtronic CIEDs were placed in an acrylic cylinder filled with a saline solution and faced a Landis+Gyr Smart Meter or Router (Landis+Gyr AG, Zug, Switzerland). The distance between CIEDs and the meter casing or router antenna was 10 cm. The Meter's normal operating conditions were modified to artificially set the number of impulsions at an abnormally high level (one, two, and three impulses per second). Each scenario was repeated one to five times, for 1 minute each. In the U.S. testing, 6 cm and 15 cm (∼2.25' and ∼6') separated the six models of Medtronic CIEDs from the Schlumberger Smart Meter (Itron Inc., Liberty Lake, WA, USA), which generally sent out a 96-bit Standard Consumption Message over 3 seconds. The transmission varied in frequencies along with the interval between cycles.<br />Results: A total of 6,966 RF transmissions were completed during the 34 tests conducted in Quebec. In the United States, the CIED was exposed to the meter for 10 minutes to provide a minimum of 200 completed RF transmissions. No interference was observed in worst-case scenarios (testing of meters and CIEDs at their performance limits).<br />Conclusions: Landis+Gyr Smart Meters/Routers and Schlumberger Smart Meters do not interfere with the functioning of the Medtronic CIEDs tested, when placed, respectively, 10 cm and 6 cm and 15 cm apart.<br /> (©2013, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1540-8159
Volume :
36
Issue :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
23875951
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.12225