Comparison of three methods (an updated logistic probabilistic method, the Naranjo and Liverpool algorithms) for the evaluation of routine pharmacovigilance case reports using consensual expert judgement as reference.

MLA

Théophile, Hélène, et al. “Comparison of Three Methods (an Updated Logistic Probabilistic Method, the Naranjo and Liverpool Algorithms) for the Evaluation of Routine Pharmacovigilance Case Reports Using Consensual Expert Judgement as Reference.” Drug Safety, vol. 36, no. 10, Oct. 2013, pp. 1033–44. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-013-0083-1.

APA

Théophile, H., André, M., Miremont-Salamé, G., Arimone, Y., & Bégaud, B. (2013). Comparison of three methods (an updated logistic probabilistic method, the Naranjo and Liverpool algorithms) for the evaluation of routine pharmacovigilance case reports using consensual expert judgement as reference. Drug Safety, 36(10), 1033–1044. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-013-0083-1

Chicago

Théophile, Hélène, Manon André, Ghada Miremont-Salamé, Yannick Arimone, and Bernard Bégaud. 2013. “Comparison of Three Methods (an Updated Logistic Probabilistic Method, the Naranjo and Liverpool Algorithms) for the Evaluation of Routine Pharmacovigilance Case Reports Using Consensual Expert Judgement as Reference.” Drug Safety 36 (10): 1033–44. doi:10.1007/s40264-013-0083-1.