Back to Search Start Over

Ultrasound-guided vs. blind steroid injections in carpal tunnel syndrome: A single-blind randomized prospective study.

Authors :
Ustün N
Tok F
Yagz AE
Kizil N
Korkmaz I
Karazincir S
Okuyucu E
Turhanoglu AD
Source :
American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation [Am J Phys Med Rehabil] 2013 Nov; Vol. 92 (11), pp. 999-1004.
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and the safety of ultrasound (US)-guided vs. blind steroid injections in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).<br />Design: This prospective randomized single-blind clinical trial included 46 patients with CTS (46 affected median nerves). The subjects were randomized-to either the US-guided or the blind injection group-before they received 40 mg of methylprednisolone. They were evaluated using the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire symptom/function at baseline and at 6 wks and 12 wks after injection, and the side effects were noted.<br />Results: The symptom severity and functional status scores improved significantly in both groups at 6 wks after treatment, and these improvements persisted at 12 wks after treatment (all P < 0.05). The improvement in symptom severity scores in the US-guided group at 12 wks was higher than in the palpation-guided group (P < 0.05). Average time to symptom relief was shorter in the US-guided group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of side effects (P > 0.05).<br />Conclusions: Although both US-guided and blind steroid injections were effective in reducing the symptoms of CTS and improving the function, an earlier onset/better improvement of symptom relief suggests that US-guided steroid injection may be more effective than are blind injections in CTS.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1537-7385
Volume :
92
Issue :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
23811617
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e31829b4d72