Back to Search
Start Over
Effects of neurofeedback versus stimulant medication in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a randomized pilot study.
- Source :
-
Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology [J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol] 2013 Sep; Vol. 23 (7), pp. 448-57. Date of Electronic Publication: 2013 Jun 29. - Publication Year :
- 2013
-
Abstract
- Objective: The purpose of this pilot study was to compare the effects of 30 sessions of neurofeedback (NF) with stimulant medication on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) patients.<br />Methods: Thirty-two medication-naïve ADHD patients, ages 7-16, from a neuropsychiatric clinic, were randomized to NF (n=16) or drug treatment (n=16). Other actions, such as parent management training, information, or support in school were given as needed, with no differences between the groups. All participants were assessed before treatment on two rating scales, each with parent and teacher forms. In addition, quantitative electroencephalogram (QEEG) and event-related potentials (ERPs), which included behavioral data from a go/no go test were administered. NF training took place in the clinic over a period of 7-11 months, and was followed by a repeat of the same assessment tools. The mean time interval between pre- and postassesment was not significantly different in the two groups. The 18 symptoms of ADHD (American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. (DSM-IV)) were used as the primary outcome measure.<br />Results: Analysis of covariance revealed a significant difference between the groups at evaluation in favor of medication, with a large effect size. This picture was confirmed by other outcome measures. The QEEG spectral power in the theta and beta bands did not change in either group. In ERP, the P3 no go component increased significantly in 8 of 12 patients who had a clinically relevant medication effect, but did not increase in the medication nonresponders or the NF group.<br />Conclusions: Our study supports effects for stimulants, but not for NF. Effects of NF may require thorough patient selection, frequent training sessions, a system for excluding nonresponders, and active transfer training. The P3 no go ERP component may be a marker for treatment response.
- Subjects :
- Adolescent
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity physiopathology
Brain Waves drug effects
Brain Waves physiology
Child
Dextroamphetamine therapeutic use
Evoked Potentials drug effects
Female
Humans
Male
Methylphenidate therapeutic use
Pilot Projects
Psychomotor Performance drug effects
Psychomotor Performance physiology
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity drug therapy
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity therapy
Central Nervous System Stimulants therapeutic use
Neurofeedback
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1557-8992
- Volume :
- 23
- Issue :
- 7
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 23808786
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1089/cap.2012.0090