Back to Search
Start Over
Hospital laboratory reporting may be a barrier to detection of 'microsize' myocardial infarction in the US: an observational study.
- Source :
-
BMC health services research [BMC Health Serv Res] 2013 May 01; Vol. 13, pp. 162. Date of Electronic Publication: 2013 May 01. - Publication Year :
- 2013
-
Abstract
- Background: International guidelines recommend that the decision threshold for troponin should be the 99th percentile of a normal population, or, if the laboratory assay is not sufficiently precise at this low level, the level at which the assay achieves a 10% or better coefficient of variation (CV). Our objectives were to examine US hospital laboratory troponin reports to determine whether either the 99th percentile or the 10% CV level were clearly indicated, and whether nonconcordance with these guidelines was a potential barrier to detecting clinically important microscopic or 'microsize' myocardial infarctions (MIs). To confirm past reports of the clinical importance of microsize MIs, we also contrasted in-hospital, 28-day and 1-year mortality among those with microsize and nonmicrosize MI.<br />Methods: In the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke national prospective cohort study (n=30,239), 1029 participants were hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) between 2003-2009. For each case, we recorded all thresholds of abnormal troponin on the laboratory report and whether the 99th percentile or 10% CV value were clearly identified. All cases were expert adjudicated for presence of MI. Peak troponin values were used to classify MIs as microsize MI (< five times the lowest listed upper limit of normal) and nonmicrosize MI.<br />Results: Participants were hospitalized at 649 acute care US hospitals, only 2% of whose lab reports clearly identified the 99th percentile or the 10% CV level; 52% of reports indicated an indeterminate range, a practice that is no longer recommended. There were 183 microsize MIs and 353 nonmicrosize MIs. In-hospital mortality tended to be lower in the microsize than in the nonmicrosize MI group (1.1 vs. 3.6%, p = 0.09), but 28-day and 1-year mortality were similar (2.5% vs. 2.7% [p = 0.93] and 5.2% vs. 4.3% [p = 0.64], respectively).<br />Conclusions: Current practices in many US hospitals created barriers to the clinical recognition of microsize MI, which was common and clinically important in our study. Improved hospital troponin reporting is warranted.
- Subjects :
- Aged
Biomarkers analysis
Female
Humans
Logistic Models
Male
Myocardial Infarction ethnology
Myocardial Infarction mortality
Reference Standards
Risk Assessment
United States epidemiology
Hospitalization statistics & numerical data
Laboratories, Hospital standards
Myocardial Infarction diagnosis
Troponin analysis
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1472-6963
- Volume :
- 13
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- BMC health services research
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 23635044
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-162