Back to Search Start Over

Primary granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis during the first two cycles only or throughout all chemotherapy cycles in patients with breast cancer at risk for febrile neutropenia.

Authors :
Aarts MJ
Peters FP
Mandigers CM
Dercksen MW
Stouthard JM
Nortier HJ
van Laarhoven HW
van Warmerdam LJ
van de Wouw AJ
Jacobs EM
Mattijssen V
van der Rijt CC
Smilde TJ
van der Velden AW
Temizkan M
Batman E
Muller EW
van Gastel SM
Borm GF
Tjan-Heijnen VC
Source :
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology [J Clin Oncol] 2013 Dec 01; Vol. 31 (34), pp. 4290-6. Date of Electronic Publication: 2013 Apr 29.
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

Purpose: Early breast cancer is commonly treated with anthracyclines and taxanes. However, combining these drugs increases the risk of myelotoxicity and may require granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. The highest incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) and largest benefit of G-CSF during the first cycles of chemotherapy lead to questions about the effectiveness of continued use of G-CSF throughout later cycles of chemotherapy.<br />Patients and Methods: In a multicenter study, patients with breast cancer who were considered fit enough to receive 3-weekly polychemotherapy, but also had > 20% risk for FN, were randomly assigned to primary G-CSF prophylaxis during the first two chemotherapy cycles only (experimental arm) or to primary G-CSF prophylaxis throughout all chemotherapy cycles (standard arm). The noninferiority hypothesis was that the incidence of FN would be maximally 7.5% higher in the experimental compared with the standard arm.<br />Results: After inclusion of 167 eligible patients, the independent data monitoring committee advised premature study closure. Of 84 patients randomly assigned to G-CSF throughout all chemotherapy cycles, eight (10%) experienced an episode of FN. In contrast, of 83 patients randomly assigned to G-CSF during the first two cycles only, 30 (36%) had an FN episode (95% CI, 0.13 to 0.54), with a peak incidence of 24% in the third cycle (ie, first cycle without G-CSF prophylaxis).<br />Conclusion: In patients with early breast cancer at high risk for FN, continued use of primary G-CSF prophylaxis during all chemotherapy cycles is of clinical relevance and thus cannot be abandoned.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1527-7755
Volume :
31
Issue :
34
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
23630211
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.44.6229