Back to Search
Start Over
Institutional, retrospective analysis of 777 patients with brain metastases: treatment outcomes and diagnosis-specific prognostic factors.
- Source :
-
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics [Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys] 2013 Jul 15; Vol. 86 (4), pp. 630-7. Date of Electronic Publication: 2013 Apr 11. - Publication Year :
- 2013
-
Abstract
- Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the prognostic factors and survival of a series of 777 patients with brain metastases (BM) from a single institution.<br />Methods and Materials: Patients were treated with surgery followed by whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) or with WBRT alone in 16.3% and 83.7% of the cases, respectively. The patients were RPA (recursive partitioning analysis) class I, II, and III in 11.2%, 69.6%, and 18.4% of the cases, respectively; RPA class II-a, II-b, and II-c in 8.3%, 24.8%, and 66.9% of the cases, respectively; and with GPA (graded prognostic assessment) scores of 0-1.0, 1.5-2.0, 2.5-3.0, and 3.5-4.0 in 35%, 27.5%, 18.2%, and 8.6% of the cases, respectively.<br />Results: The median overall survival (OS) times according to RPA class I, II, and III were 20.1, 5.1, and 1.3 months, respectively (P<.0001); according to RPA class II-a, II-b, II-c: 9.1, 8.9, and 4.0 months, respectively (P<.0001); and according to GPA score 0-1.0, 1.5-2.0, 2.5-3.0, and 3.5-4.0: 2.5, 4.4, 9.0, and 19.1 months, respectively (P<.0001). By multivariate analysis, the favorable independent prognostic factors for survival were as follows: for gastrointestinal tumor, a high Karnofsky performance status (KPS) (P=.0003) and an absence of extracranial metastases (ECM) (P=.003); for kidney cancer, few BM (P=.002); for melanoma, few BM (P=.01), an absence of ECM (P=.002), and few ECM (P=.0002); for lung cancer, age (P=.007), a high KPS (P<.0001), an absence of ECM (P<.0001), few ECM and BM (P<.0001 and P=.0006, respectively), and control of the primary tumor (P=.004); and for breast cancer, age (P=.001), a high KPS (P=.007), control of the primary tumor (P=.05), and few ECM and BM (P=.01 and P=.0002, respectively). The triple-negative subtype was a significant unfavorable factor (P=.007).<br />Conclusion: Prognostic factors varied by pathology. Our analysis confirms the strength of prognostic factors used to determine the GPA score, including the genetic subtype for breast cancer.<br /> (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Brain Neoplasms radiotherapy
Brain Neoplasms surgery
Breast Neoplasms pathology
Cranial Irradiation methods
Female
Gastrointestinal Neoplasms pathology
Humans
Karnofsky Performance Status
Kidney Neoplasms pathology
Lung Neoplasms pathology
Male
Melanoma mortality
Melanoma radiotherapy
Melanoma secondary
Melanoma surgery
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Prognosis
Radiotherapy Dosage
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Brain Neoplasms mortality
Brain Neoplasms secondary
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1879-355X
- Volume :
- 86
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 23582409
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.02.027