Back to Search
Start Over
Randomized comparison of sirolimus-eluting and everolimus-eluting coronary stents in the treatment of total coronary occlusions: results from the chronic coronary occlusion treated by everolimus-eluting stent randomized trial.
- Source :
-
Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions [Circ Cardiovasc Interv] 2013 Feb; Vol. 6 (1), pp. 21-8. Date of Electronic Publication: 2013 Feb 12. - Publication Year :
- 2013
-
Abstract
- Background: Patients with coronary total occlusions are at especially high risk for restenosis and new revascularizations. Sirolimus-eluting stents dramatically improved the clinical outcome of this subset of patients in randomized trials, but other drug-eluting stents, mainly the everolimus-eluting stent (currently the most frequently used stent), have not yet been evaluated in patients with coronary total occlusions. The objective was to compare the second-generation everolimus-eluting stent with the first-generation sirolimus-eluting stent in patients with coronary total occlusions.<br />Methods and Results: A total of 207 patients with coronary total occlusions and estimated time since occlusion >2 weeks were randomized to everolimus- or sirolimus-eluting stent. The primary end point was in-stent late loss at 9-month angiographic follow-up (noninferiority trial). Clinical follow-up was performed at 1 and 12 months. In-stent late loss at 9 months was 0.29±0.60 versus 0.13±0.69 mm in patients allocated to sirolimus- and everolimus-eluting stent, respectively. The observed difference in in-stent late loss between both groups was -0.16 mm (95% confidence interval, 0.04 to -0.36 mm; P for noninferiority <0.01). The rate of binary angiographic restenosis was 10.8% and 9.1% in patients allocated to sirolimus- and everolimus-eluting stent, respectively (P=0.709), whereas the rate of vessel reocclusion was 3.2% and 1.1%, respectively (P=0.339). At 12 months, the rate of major adverse events was 15.9% versus 11.1% with sirolimus- and everolimus-eluting stent, respectively (P=0.335), and probable or definitive stent thrombosis occurred in 3.0% and 0.0% of patients, respectively (P=0.075).<br />Conclusions: In patients with coronary total occlusions, everolimus-eluting stent is as effective as sirolimus-eluting stent.<br />Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00793221.
- Subjects :
- Aged
Coronary Angiography
Coronary Artery Disease mortality
Coronary Artery Disease surgery
Coronary Restenosis etiology
Drug-Eluting Stents statistics & numerical data
Everolimus
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Infarction complications
Myocardial Infarction mortality
Myocardial Infarction surgery
Risk
Sirolimus adverse effects
Survival Analysis
Treatment Outcome
Coronary Artery Disease drug therapy
Coronary Restenosis prevention & control
Myocardial Infarction drug therapy
Myocardial Revascularization
Postoperative Complications prevention & control
Sirolimus administration & dosage
Sirolimus analogs & derivatives
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1941-7632
- Volume :
- 6
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 23403384
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.000076