Back to Search Start Over

Randomized comparison of sirolimus-eluting and everolimus-eluting coronary stents in the treatment of total coronary occlusions: results from the chronic coronary occlusion treated by everolimus-eluting stent randomized trial.

Authors :
Moreno R
García E
Teles R
Rumoroso JR
Cyrne Carvalho H
Goicolea FJ
Moreu J
Mauri J
Sabaté M
Mainar V
Patricio L
Valdés M
Fernández Vázquez F
Sánchez-Recalde A
Galeote G
Jimenez-Valero S
Almeida M
Lopez de Sa E
Calvo L
Plaza I
Lopez-Sendón JL
Martín JL
Source :
Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions [Circ Cardiovasc Interv] 2013 Feb; Vol. 6 (1), pp. 21-8. Date of Electronic Publication: 2013 Feb 12.
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

Background: Patients with coronary total occlusions are at especially high risk for restenosis and new revascularizations. Sirolimus-eluting stents dramatically improved the clinical outcome of this subset of patients in randomized trials, but other drug-eluting stents, mainly the everolimus-eluting stent (currently the most frequently used stent), have not yet been evaluated in patients with coronary total occlusions. The objective was to compare the second-generation everolimus-eluting stent with the first-generation sirolimus-eluting stent in patients with coronary total occlusions.<br />Methods and Results: A total of 207 patients with coronary total occlusions and estimated time since occlusion >2 weeks were randomized to everolimus- or sirolimus-eluting stent. The primary end point was in-stent late loss at 9-month angiographic follow-up (noninferiority trial). Clinical follow-up was performed at 1 and 12 months. In-stent late loss at 9 months was 0.29±0.60 versus 0.13±0.69 mm in patients allocated to sirolimus- and everolimus-eluting stent, respectively. The observed difference in in-stent late loss between both groups was -0.16 mm (95% confidence interval, 0.04 to -0.36 mm; P for noninferiority <0.01). The rate of binary angiographic restenosis was 10.8% and 9.1% in patients allocated to sirolimus- and everolimus-eluting stent, respectively (P=0.709), whereas the rate of vessel reocclusion was 3.2% and 1.1%, respectively (P=0.339). At 12 months, the rate of major adverse events was 15.9% versus 11.1% with sirolimus- and everolimus-eluting stent, respectively (P=0.335), and probable or definitive stent thrombosis occurred in 3.0% and 0.0% of patients, respectively (P=0.075).<br />Conclusions: In patients with coronary total occlusions, everolimus-eluting stent is as effective as sirolimus-eluting stent.<br />Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00793221.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1941-7632
Volume :
6
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
23403384
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.000076