Back to Search Start Over

Validity and reliability of nerve and muscle ultrasound.

Authors :
Cartwright MS
Demar S
Griffin LP
Balakrishnan N
Harris JM
Walker FO
Source :
Muscle & nerve [Muscle Nerve] 2013 Apr; Vol. 47 (4), pp. 515-21. Date of Electronic Publication: 2013 Feb 08.
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

Introduction: Nerve and muscle ultrasound has been studied in several conditions, but validity and reliability have not been assessed systematically.<br />Methods: Nerve cross-sectional area and muscle thickness were measured ultrasonographically at several sites in 4 cadavers, which were then dissected, and actual measurements were obtained. To assess intrarater and interrater reliability, between 3 and 5 ultrasonographers, with varying experience levels, made repeated measurements on healthy volunteers.<br />Results: Correlation coefficients for nerve and muscle validity were >0.968 (P < 0.001), and for intrarater reliability were >0.901 (P < 0.001) for still and real-time images. Correlation coefficients for interrater reliability were more varied, but for still images they were all significant at the P < 0.001 (0.542-0.998) level, and for real-time images they were significant at the P < 0.05 level for half the sites (0.243-0.981).<br />Conclusion: Overall, nerve and muscle ultrasound is a valid and reliable diagnostic imaging technique.<br /> (Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1097-4598
Volume :
47
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Muscle & nerve
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
23400913
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.23621