Back to Search
Start Over
Validity and reliability of nerve and muscle ultrasound.
- Source :
-
Muscle & nerve [Muscle Nerve] 2013 Apr; Vol. 47 (4), pp. 515-21. Date of Electronic Publication: 2013 Feb 08. - Publication Year :
- 2013
-
Abstract
- Introduction: Nerve and muscle ultrasound has been studied in several conditions, but validity and reliability have not been assessed systematically.<br />Methods: Nerve cross-sectional area and muscle thickness were measured ultrasonographically at several sites in 4 cadavers, which were then dissected, and actual measurements were obtained. To assess intrarater and interrater reliability, between 3 and 5 ultrasonographers, with varying experience levels, made repeated measurements on healthy volunteers.<br />Results: Correlation coefficients for nerve and muscle validity were >0.968 (P < 0.001), and for intrarater reliability were >0.901 (P < 0.001) for still and real-time images. Correlation coefficients for interrater reliability were more varied, but for still images they were all significant at the P < 0.001 (0.542-0.998) level, and for real-time images they were significant at the P < 0.05 level for half the sites (0.243-0.981).<br />Conclusion: Overall, nerve and muscle ultrasound is a valid and reliable diagnostic imaging technique.<br /> (Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1097-4598
- Volume :
- 47
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Muscle & nerve
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 23400913
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.23621