Back to Search Start Over

Biomechanical testing of a new plate system for the distal humerus compared to two well-established implants.

Authors :
Voigt C
Rank C
Waizner K
Wendlandt R
Unger A
Schulz AP
Jürgens C
Renken F
Source :
International orthopaedics [Int Orthop] 2013 Apr; Vol. 37 (4), pp. 667-72. Date of Electronic Publication: 2013 Jan 29.
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

Purpose: A biomechanical study was performed to test the hypothesis that a new anatomically preformed, thinner, soft-tissue protecting plate system for distal humeral fractures (Tifix®-hybridplate [HP]) would show comparable results in the quasi-static and dynamic testings compared to two conventional implants: The 3.5-mm reconstruction plate (RP) providing primary stability with normal bone mineral density (BMD), and a multidirectional locking plate (Tifix(®)-plate [P]) which can be used with poor bone quality.<br />Methods: The Tifix(®)-HP was developed by the working group. The biomechanical testing was performed on a C2-fracture-model in 24 synthetic humeri. Three groups, each with eight bone-implant-constructs, were analysed in quasi-static and dynamic tests.<br />Results: The quasi-static measurements showed that under extension loading both locking plates (Tifix(®)-P, Tifix(®)-HP) were significantly stiffer than the reconstruction plate, and that the Tifix(®)-HP had a significantly lower stiffness than the two other implants under flexion loading. In the dynamic tests the Tifix(®)-P allowed significantly less fracture motion compared to the Tifix(®)-HP and the reconstruction plate. In an osteopaenic bone model locking plates failed only under much higher dynamic force than the reconstruction plate. The reconstruction plate and the Tifix(®)-P always failed through screw loosening, whereas the newly developed Tifix(®)-HP showed screw loosening in only one third of cases.<br />Conclusion: The hypothesis that the newly designed plate system showed comparable results in the quasi-static and dynamic tests compared to the conventional implants with a significantly lower implant volume and thickness was confirmed.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1432-5195
Volume :
37
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
International orthopaedics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
23359099
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1779-7