Back to Search Start Over

Ten year research update (2001-2010): evaluations for competence to stand trial (adjudicative competence).

Authors :
Fogel MH
Schiffman W
Mumley D
Tillbrook C
Grisso T
Source :
Behavioral sciences & the law [Behav Sci Law] 2013 Mar-Apr; Vol. 31 (2), pp. 165-91. Date of Electronic Publication: 2013 Jan 24.
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

This article reviews and evaluates publications during 2001-2010 with relevance for assessments of competence to stand trial, referred to in this article as adjudicative competence. The review focuses specifically on articles that provide new concepts or data supported by research or case analyses. The studies are reviewed under the following headings: (i) systemic issues, (ii) conceptual guidelines for AC evaluations, (iii) AC assessment methods, (iv) empirical correlates of AC judgments and psycholegal abilities, (v) quality of AC evaluations and reports, (vi) interpretive issues, (vii) special populations (defendants who are elderly, defendants with intellectual disabilities), (viii) AC evaluations of juveniles, and (ix) treatment of incompetent defendants. Suggestions are offered for further research to advance the quality of clinical evaluations of adjudicative competence.<br /> (Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1099-0798
Volume :
31
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Behavioral sciences & the law
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
23348511
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2051