Reduced-dose low-voltage chest CT angiography with Sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction versus standard-dose filtered back projection.

Purpose: To evaluate image quality of low-voltage chest computed tomographic (CT) angiography with raw data-based iterative reconstruction (sonogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction) in comparison with image quality of standard-dose standard-voltage filtered back projection (FBP) CT.
Materials and Methods: This prospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and the informed consent requirement was waived. Eighty consecutive patients who were referred for follow-up chest CT angiography underwent reduced-dose CT (hereafter, T2 examination) under technical conditions similar to those of the initial examination (hereafter, T1 examination), except the voltage selection was reduced by 20 kV with adaptation of the tube current to ensure a 50% reduction in CT dose index, and regular FBP was replaced by iterative reconstruction with sonogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction. The two techniques were compared by using paired tests (Student t test, Wilcoxon test, or McNemar test, according to the nature of variables).
Results: When compared with standard-dose T1 studies, reduced-dose T2 images showed: (a) significantly less objective noise at the level of the trachea on mediastinal and lung parenchymal images (P < .001) and no significant difference in objective noise at the level of the aorta on mediastinal images (P = .507); (b) significantly higher signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise (P < .001) ratios; (c) similar visual perception of noise on mediastinal (P = .132) and lung (P = .366) images, mainly rated as moderate; and (d) similar overall subjective image quality (P = .405).
Conclusion: Raw data-based iterative reconstruction yielded equivalent subjective and improved objective image quality of low-voltage half-dose CT angiograms compared with standard-dose FBP CT images for an average dose-length product of less than 80 mGy · cm in this population.
Supplemental Material: http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.12120414/-/DC1.
(© RSNA, 2013.)