Back to Search Start Over

AMIGAS: a multicity, multicomponent cervical cancer prevention trial among Mexican American women.

Authors :
Byrd TL
Wilson KM
Smith JL
Coronado G
Vernon SW
Fernandez-Esquer ME
Thompson B
Ortiz M
Lairson D
Fernandez ME
Source :
Cancer [Cancer] 2013 Apr 01; Vol. 119 (7), pp. 1365-72. Date of Electronic Publication: 2012 Dec 21.
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

Background: Considerable efforts have been undertaken in the United States to reduce cervical cancer incidence and mortality by increasing screening; however, disparities in screening rates continue to exist among certain racial and ethnic minority groups. The objective of the current study was to determine the effectiveness of a lay health worker-delivered intervention-AMIGAS (Ayudando a las Mujeres con Informacion, Guia, y Amor para su Salud [helping women with information, guidance, and love for their health])-to increase Papanicolaou (Pap) test screening among 3 populations of women of Mexican origin.<br />Methods: Six hundred thirteen women of Mexican origin in 3 treatment sites were randomized among 4 study arms: the full AMIGAS program with a video and a flip chart (n = 151), the AMIGAS program without the video (n = 154), the AMIGAS program without the flip chart (n = 155), and a usual care control group (n = 153). Six months after enrollment, women were surveyed and reported whether or not they had been screened.<br />Results: Women in any of the intervention arms were statistically significantly more likely to report being screened than those in the usual care group in both an intent-to-treat analysis and a per-protocol analysis. In the intent-to-treat analysis, 25% of women in the control group and 52% in the full AMIGAS program group reported having had Pap tests (P < .001); in the per-protocol analysis, the percentages were 29% and 62%, respectively (P < .001).<br />Conclusions: AMIGAS was effective in increasing Pap test screening among women of Mexican descent when used in a 1-to-1 setting. Future research should compare the 1-on-1 intervention with the group-based intervention.<br /> (Copyright © 2012 American Cancer Society.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1097-0142
Volume :
119
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Cancer
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
23280399
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.27926