Back to Search Start Over

Persistent overall survival benefit and no increased risk of second malignancies with bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone versus melphalan-prednisone in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma.

Authors :
San Miguel JF
Schlag R
Khuageva NK
Dimopoulos MA
Shpilberg O
Kropff M
Spicka I
Petrucci MT
Palumbo A
Samoilova OS
Dmoszynska A
Abdulkadyrov KM
Delforge M
Jiang B
Mateos MV
Anderson KC
Esseltine DL
Liu K
Deraedt W
Cakana A
van de Velde H
Richardson PG
Source :
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology [J Clin Oncol] 2013 Feb 01; Vol. 31 (4), pp. 448-55. Date of Electronic Publication: 2012 Dec 10.
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

Purpose: This final analysis of the phase III VISTA trial (Velcade As Initial Standard Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: Assessment With Melphalan and Prednisone) was conducted to determine whether the overall survival (OS) benefit with bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP) versus melphalan-prednisone (MP) in patients with myeloma who were ineligible for transplantation was maintained after 5 years of follow-up and to explore the risk of second primary malignancies.<br />Patients and Methods: In all, 682 patients received up to nine 6-week cycles of VMP or MP and were then observed every 12 weeks or less. Data on second primary malignancies were collected by individual patient inquiries at all sites from 655 patients.<br />Results: After median follow-up of 60.1 months (range, 0 to 74 months), there was a 31% reduced risk of death with VMP versus MP (hazard ratio [HR], 0.695; P < .001; median OS 56.4 v 43.1 months). OS benefit with VMP was seen across prespecified patient subgroups (age ≥ 75 years, stage III myeloma, creatinine clearance < 60 mL/min). Sixty-three percent of VMP patients and 73% of MP patients had received subsequent therapy. Time to next therapy (median, 30.7 v 20.5 months; HR, 0.557; P < .001) was longer with VMP than with MP. Among patients who received subsequent therapies, survival from start of subsequent therapy was similar following VMP (median, 28.1 months) or MP (median, 26.8 months; HR, 0.914). Following VMP/MP, incidence proportions of hematologic malignancies (1%/1%) and solid tumors (5%/3%) and exposure-adjusted incidence rates (0.017/0.013 per patient-year) were similar and were consistent with background rates.<br />Conclusion: VMP resulted in a significant reduction in risk of death versus MP that was maintained after 5 years' follow-up and despite substantial use of novel-agent-based salvage therapies. There is no emerging safety signal for second primary malignancies following VMP.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1527-7755
Volume :
31
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
23233713
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.41.6180