Back to Search
Start Over
Accessibility from the patient perspective: comparison of primary healthcare evaluation instruments.
Accessibility from the patient perspective: comparison of primary healthcare evaluation instruments.
- Source :
-
Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante [Healthc Policy] 2011 Dec; Vol. 7 (Spec Issue), pp. 94-107. - Publication Year :
- 2011
-
Abstract
- Unlabelled: The operational definition of first-contact accessibility is "the ease with which a person can obtain needed care (including advice and support) from the practitioner of choice within a time frame appropriate to the urgency of the problem"; accommodation is "the way healthcare resources are organized to accommodate a wide range of patients' abilities to contact healthcare providers and reach healthcare services, that is to say telephone services, flexible appointment systems, hours of operation, and walk-in periods."<br />Objective: To compare how well accessibility is measured in validated subscales that evaluate primary healthcare from the patient's perspective.<br />Method: 645 adults with at least one healthcare contact in the previous 12 months responded to six instruments that evaluate primary healthcare with four subscales that measure accessibility: the Primary Care Assessment Survey (PCAS), the Primary Care Assessment Tool - Short Form (PCAT-S, two subscales) and the first version of the EUROPEP (EUROPEP-I). Scores were normalized to a 0-to-10 scale for descriptive comparison. Exploratory and confirmatory (structural equation modelling) factor analysis examined fit to operational definition, and item response theory analysis examined item performance on common constructs.<br />Results: The subscales demonstrate similar psychometric measures to those reported by developers. The PCAT-S First-Contact Utilization subscale does not fit the accessibility construct. The remaining three subscales load reasonably onto a single factor, presumed to be accessibility, but the best-fitting model has two factors: "timeliness of obtaining needed care" (PCAT-S First-Contact Access, some EUROPEP-I items) and "how resources are organized to accommodate clients" (PCAS Organizational Access and most of EUROPEP-I organization of care). Items in the PCAS and PCAT-S subscales have good discriminability.<br />Conclusion: Only three of the four subscales measure accessibility; all are appropriate for use in Canada. The PCAT-S First-Contact Access subscale is the best measure for first-contact accessibility, and PCAS Organizational Accessibility has good metric properties and measures for accommodation.
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1715-6580
- Volume :
- 7
- Issue :
- Spec Issue
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 23205038