Back to Search Start Over

Accessibility from the patient perspective: comparison of primary healthcare evaluation instruments.

Accessibility from the patient perspective: comparison of primary healthcare evaluation instruments.

Authors :
Haggerty JL
Lévesque JF
Santor DA
Burge F
Beaulieu C
Bouharaoui F
Beaulieu MD
Pineault R
Gass D
Source :
Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante [Healthc Policy] 2011 Dec; Vol. 7 (Spec Issue), pp. 94-107.
Publication Year :
2011

Abstract

Unlabelled: The operational definition of first-contact accessibility is "the ease with which a person can obtain needed care (including advice and support) from the practitioner of choice within a time frame appropriate to the urgency of the problem"; accommodation is "the way healthcare resources are organized to accommodate a wide range of patients' abilities to contact healthcare providers and reach healthcare services, that is to say telephone services, flexible appointment systems, hours of operation, and walk-in periods."<br />Objective: To compare how well accessibility is measured in validated subscales that evaluate primary healthcare from the patient's perspective.<br />Method: 645 adults with at least one healthcare contact in the previous 12 months responded to six instruments that evaluate primary healthcare with four subscales that measure accessibility: the Primary Care Assessment Survey (PCAS), the Primary Care Assessment Tool - Short Form (PCAT-S, two subscales) and the first version of the EUROPEP (EUROPEP-I). Scores were normalized to a 0-to-10 scale for descriptive comparison. Exploratory and confirmatory (structural equation modelling) factor analysis examined fit to operational definition, and item response theory analysis examined item performance on common constructs.<br />Results: The subscales demonstrate similar psychometric measures to those reported by developers. The PCAT-S First-Contact Utilization subscale does not fit the accessibility construct. The remaining three subscales load reasonably onto a single factor, presumed to be accessibility, but the best-fitting model has two factors: "timeliness of obtaining needed care" (PCAT-S First-Contact Access, some EUROPEP-I items) and "how resources are organized to accommodate clients" (PCAS Organizational Access and most of EUROPEP-I organization of care). Items in the PCAS and PCAT-S subscales have good discriminability.<br />Conclusion: Only three of the four subscales measure accessibility; all are appropriate for use in Canada. The PCAT-S First-Contact Access subscale is the best measure for first-contact accessibility, and PCAS Organizational Accessibility has good metric properties and measures for accommodation.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1715-6580
Volume :
7
Issue :
Spec Issue
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
23205038